Hazzazi · Journal of dentistry 2024 · cross-sectional study · n=101

Tap water filtration and purification usage and their impact on the concentrations of fluoride and other minerals - A community-based study.

Cited 2 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional survey and water sampling study

PubMed 39349095 · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105377 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Researchers surveyed 101 residents in central Indiana (USA) regarding demographics, water sources, and use of water filtration and purification systems (WFPS). Participants provided water samples from their tap or WFPS. Water samples were tested for fluoride using ion-specific electrodes, and for calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium using atomic absorption spectrometry. Mineral concentrations and questionnaire data were analyzed using non-parametric tests, chi-square tests, and correlations.

What was found

Among the 101 participants, 71% reported using a WFPS. Usage was higher among individuals with a bachelor's degree or higher (p = 0.003) and lower among Black participants compared to Asian or White participants (p = 0.045). Pitcher filters were the most commonly used system (31%), followed by water softeners (21%), reverse osmosis (11%), faucet-mounted filters (4%), and whole-house carbon filters (1%). Reverse osmosis systems produced the lowest median mineral concentrations (fluoride: 0.08 ppm, calcium: 2.30 ppm, magnesium: 0.46 ppm, sodium: 4.60 ppm, potassium: 0.35 ppm). Pitcher filters yielded mineral concentrations comparable to unfiltered tap water, while water softeners produced the highest sodium levels (median 78.40 ppm).

Why it matters

Patients using reverse osmosis systems may deplete protective fluoride and essential minerals from their drinking water, informing dental caries risk assessments and the need for supplemental fluoride.

Limits

The study had a small sample size (n = 101) restricted to a single geographic area (central Indiana), limiting generalizability. Specific device brands, filter ages, and maintenance schedules were not detailed in the abstract, and baseline source water mineral levels before filtration were not paired across all individual samples.

Cited by