Hudspeth · The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2024 · narrative review · n=?

The Critical Thing about the Ear's Sensory Hair Cells.

Cited 12 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and mechanism-based theoretical reasoning with no primary human data

PubMed 39477536 · doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1583-24.2024 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This is a narrative review describing the active biophysical processes of inner ear mechanoreceptors, detailing how sensory hair cells amplify, tune, and scale acoustic signals through the physics of critical phenomena and oscillatory instability.

What was found

The abstract outlines baseline human auditory performance: acoustic detection down to 0 dB sound-pressure level (inducing picometer-range eardrum vibrations) up to 120 dB (a trillionfold power range), frequency discrimination of tones differing by 0.2%, and cochlear tuning across ~20 Hz to 20,000 Hz utilizing approximately 16,000 hair cells per cochlea. It describes evidence that hair cells actively amplify and scale sound by operating near an oscillatory instability. No primary empirical trial results or numerical effect sizes are reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

It provides a biophysical framework explaining the ear's extreme sensitivity and sharp frequency tuning as critical phenomena near an oscillatory threshold.

Limits

As a theoretical narrative review, the abstract includes no primary clinical or experimental dataset, sample size, or quantitative test statistics.

Cited by