Yeo · Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 2025 · systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies · n=43 studies (5,246,796 participants)

Dual sensory impairment: Global prevalence, future projections, and its association with cognitive decline.

Cited 17 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies

PubMed 39887563 · doi:10.1002/alz.14465 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Three databases were searched for epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence of dual sensory impairment (comorbid hearing and vision impairment) and its association with cognitive decline. Independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate prevalence, cognitive impairment rates, and odds of incident cognitive decline. Population attributable fraction was calculated, and global projections through 2050 were modeled using United Nations population data.

What was found

Across 43 studies totaling 5,246,796 participants, the pooled prevalence of clinically assessed dual sensory impairment was 5.50% (95% CI: 2.88% to 10.26%), with wide variation by age, region, and ethnicity, and is projected to rise by 27.2% from 2025 to 2050. Among individuals with dual sensory impairment, 59.83% (95% CI: 41.03% to 76.12%) had cognitive impairment. Baseline dual sensory impairment was significantly associated with incident cognitive decline (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.15). Globally, 3.81% (95% CI: 1.05% to 10.55%) of incident cognitive decline was estimated to be attributable to dual sensory impairment.

Why it matters

This meta-analysis provides large-scale benchmark estimates for comorbid vision and hearing loss and quantifies its longitudinal link to cognitive decline, highlighting sensory screening and intervention as potential public health targets.

Limits

The underlying studies were observational, which precludes causal inference between sensory loss and cognitive decline. The prevalence and cognitive impairment estimates exhibited broad confidence intervals, reflecting marked heterogeneity across geographic regions, assessment methods, and demographic cohorts.

Cited by