Menuet · Nature reviews. Cardiology 2025 · expert recommendation / narrative review · n=?

Redefining respiratory sinus arrhythmia as respiratory heart rate variability: an international Expert Recommendation for terminological clarity.

Cited 53 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Expert consensus recommendation proposing terminology change with no primary human data or systematic review methodology.

PubMed 40328963 · doi:10.1038/s41569-025-01160-z · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

An international panel of experts evaluated the terminology, physiological mechanisms, and interpretation of respiratory-driven heart rate fluctuations to formulate an Expert Recommendation on standard nomenclature.

What was found

The abstract reports no empirical data or quantitative metrics. The authors argue that the traditional label 'respiratory sinus arrhythmia' (RSA) carries misleading pathological connotations despite describing a normal physiological phenomenon. They recommend adopting the term 'respiratory heart rate variability' (RespHRV), clarify that RespHRV spans both low-frequency and high-frequency spectral bands depending on breathing rate, and emphasize that RespHRV amplitude should not be equated directly with cardiac vagal tone.

Why it matters

Adopting clearer terminology prevents the misinterpretation of a normal physiological process as a cardiac arrhythmia and promotes more accurate physiological interpretation in autonomic and cardiovascular research.

Limits

This publication is an expert recommendation and conceptual review without primary experimental data, prospective validation, or systematic review methodology. The practical adoption and utility of the proposed nomenclature across clinical and research fields remain to be demonstrated.

Cited by