McCaughey · Histopathology 2025 · Delphi consensus study · n=31

Standardizing the histopathological diagnosis of adenomyosis: an international Delphi consensus.

Cited 2 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Modified Delphi expert consensus study without empirical diagnostic trial data.

PubMed 40539549 · doi:10.1111/his.15480 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Between April and September 2024, a modified three-round Delphi consensus study was conducted involving 31 gynecological pathologists across 18 countries to evaluate and refine a diagnostic framework and tissue sampling protocol for adenomyosis in hysterectomy specimens.

What was found

Overall, 93% of respondents favored standardizing diagnostic criteria. The highest level of agreement was achieved for: sampling 4-6 blocks for routine examination of benign hysterectomy specimens; defining adenomyosis as endometrial glands and/or stroma extending >2 mm into the myometrium or >one-third of myometrial thickness; establishing that the absolute quantity of glands or stroma does not govern diagnosis and a single focus can be diagnostic; and establishing specific definitions for focal, extensive, superficial, and deep adenomyosis.

Why it matters

This paper establishes the first international consensus-based criteria for the histopathological diagnosis of adenomyosis, directly addressing substantial inter-observer variability in routine pathology reporting.

Limits

The criteria represent expert opinion rather than empirical diagnostic validation. The sample size was limited to 31 pathologists, the framework applies strictly to hysterectomy specimens, and the abstract notes that clinical correlation with symptoms and patient outcomes has not yet been established.

Cited by