Wu · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2025 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=8 studies (291 participants)

The Effects and Safety of Gamma Rhythm Stimulation on Cognitive Function in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cited 3 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 40855942 · doi:10.1177/15459683251360733 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

A systematic review and meta-analysis searched PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid-Embase, and Ovid-MEDLINE through April 2024 for randomized controlled trials evaluating gamma rhythm stimulation (notably 40 Hz brain or sensory stimulation) on cognitive function and safety in Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive outcomes included the Face-Name Association Test (FNAT), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

What was found

Eight studies comprising 291 participants were analyzed. Pooled effects favored gamma stimulation for cognitive measures: FNAT (SMD = 3.76, 95% CI: 2.52 to 4.99; I² = 65%), MMSE (SMD = 3.09, 95% CI: 2.37 to 3.82; I² = 0%), ADAS-cog (SMD = -4.16, 95% CI: -6.60 to -2.62; I² = 0%), and MoCA (SMD = 2.17, 95% CI: -0.54 to 4.88; I² = 0%). Adverse events showed no statistically significant difference versus sham (P = .06).

Why it matters

This review compiles the available randomized trial evidence for 40 Hz gamma stimulation in Alzheimer's disease, showing early signals of cognitive enhancement with an acceptable safety profile.

Limits

The total sample size was small (291 participants across 8 studies, averaging ~36 patients per trial). Standardized mean differences greater than 3.0 to 4.0 are extraordinarily large for clinical dementia trials and strongly suggest small-study effects or publication bias. The confidence interval for MoCA crossed null.

Cited by