Iroanya · Human gene therapy 2025 · narrative review · n=?

Pre-Existing Anti-Adeno-Associated Virus Immunity in Gene Therapy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Potential Solutions.

Cited 6 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of mechanisms and mitigation strategies with no new human or experimental data.

PubMed 40985164 · doi:10.1177/10430342251378524 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This narrative review synthesized existing literature on the immunological barriers to adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy. It evaluated mechanisms of immune detection and clearance—including pattern recognition receptors, complement activation, and neutralizing antibodies—and outlined host, serotype, and delivery factors that alter transduction. It proposed a three-pronged framework classifying mitigation strategies into immune-focused, delivery-focused, and capsid-focused categories.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative metrics or effect sizes. It qualitatively summarizes the mechanisms driving vector clearance and details three intervention categories: (1) immune-focused strategies (e.g., plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, enzymatic antibody cleavage, B cell depletion, and corticosteroids); (2) delivery-focused strategies (e.g., localized or intrathecal delivery, immune-privileged targeting, and administration timing); and (3) capsid-focused strategies (e.g., rational capsid engineering, empty capsid decoys, and AAV-specific regulatory T cells).

Why it matters

Pre-existing neutralizing antibodies exclude a substantial portion of patients from receiving approved and investigational AAV gene therapies. Structuring mitigation techniques into clear operational categories helps guide preclinical development toward re-dosable and broader-access vector platforms.

Limits

As a narrative review, the paper introduces no new empirical data, clinical trials, or systematic meta-analytic syntheses. The abstract provides no quantitative comparisons of the efficacy, safety, or feasibility of the proposed mitigation approaches.

Cited by