Sun · The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 2025 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=20 studies (1,242 participants)

Efficiency of time-restricted eating and energy restriction on anthropometrics and body composition in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cited 2 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 41034862 · doi:10.1186/s12966-025-01812-w · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Authors systematically searched five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus) for randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of time-restricted eating (TRE) alone or combined with energy restriction (TRE + ER) on adult body composition. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses evaluated changes as weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals.

What was found

Across 20 RCTs totaling 1,242 participants, TRE alone significantly reduced body weight (WMD -1.59 kg, 95% CI -2.02 to -1.15), fat mass (WMD -0.93 kg, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.63), fat-free mass (WMD -0.58 kg, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.36), BMI (WMD -0.63 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.30), and waist circumference (WMD -2.11 cm, 95% CI -3.35 to -0.86) versus no restriction. TRE plus ER also reduced body weight (WMD -0.94 kg, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.31), fat mass (WMD -1.13 kg, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.75), fat-free mass (WMD -0.56 kg, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.31), BMI (WMD -0.42 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.07), and waist circumference (WMD -2.20 cm, 95% CI -2.64 to -1.75) versus ER alone. Fat mass percentage did not change significantly in either comparison.

Why it matters

This review shows that time-restricted eating produces modest weight and fat loss on its own, but offers little additional weight loss benefit when combined with conventional energy restriction.

Limits

The abstract does not report study durations, adherence rates, specific fasting window protocols, or baseline participant health profiles. Both interventions caused concurrent reductions in fat-free mass alongside fat loss, and long-term sustainability was not evaluated.

Cited by