Hlutkowsky · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS 2026 · case-control cognitive modeling study · n=62

A diffusion model analysis of task set inertia and task set reconfiguration in ADHD.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Case-control observational study comparing cognitive performance between children with ADHD and controls.

PubMed 41636125 · doi:10.1017/S135561772510180X · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Children aged 8-12 years with ADHD (N = 34) and non-ADHD controls (N = 28; overall average age = 9.45) completed a 192-trial computerized cued switching paradigm. A diffusion model decomposition was applied to isolate cognitive subprocesses underlying switch performance, assessing task set inertia (drift rate) and task set reconfiguration time (Ter) across switch versus repeat trials.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical values, effect sizes, or test statistics. Across all children, switch costs were associated with both reduced drift rate (task set inertia) and slower Ter (task set reconfiguration) on switch compared to repeat trials. Children with ADHD had lower accuracy overall compared to controls, attributed to a slower general drift rate; however, ADHD-by-switch interactions were not significant for any variable, showing the deficit was general rather than specific to switching.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that performance impairments on executive switching tasks in ADHD reflect generalized deficits in lower-level perceptual decision-making rather than deficits in switch-specific cognitive reconfiguration.

Limits

The sample size is modest (total N = 62). The abstract provides no exact quantitative data, confidence intervals, or p-values, and does not report clinical details such as ADHD subtypes, medication status, or psychiatric comorbidities.

Cited by