Wysota · Addictive behaviors 2026 · Cross-sectional survey study · n=1992

Cannabis use in pregnancy: Key findings from 2021-2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data.

Cited 2 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional survey analysis

PubMed 41643368 · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2026.108621 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Researchers analyzed pooled cross-sectional data from 1,992 pregnant participants in the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) between 2021 and 2023. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate sociodemographic, substance use, and clinical correlates of cannabis use status, comparing never users against current (past 30-day), recent (past 2–12 months), and former (non-use in past year) users.

What was found

Nearly 7% of pregnant respondents reported current cannabis use. Among current users, 31% reported doctor-recommended use in the past year and 52% purchased cannabis from a dispensary. Relative to never users, current cannabis use was significantly higher among individuals aged 18–25 years (Relative Risk Ratio [RRR] = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.04–4.18), unmarried participants (RRR = 2.54, 95% CI: 1.05–6.14), those with higher education compared to less than high school (RRR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.42–6.23), and those with past 30-day cigarette use (RRR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.11–5.94), alcohol use (RRR = 7.24, 95% CI: 1.52–34.49), e-cigarette use (RRR = 4.92, 95% CI: 1.71–14.10), or serious psychological distress (RRR = 6.25, 95% CI: 2.46–15.85). Perceiving some risk from weekly cannabis use was associated with lower current use (RRR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03–0.14). Recent use versus never use was lower in states where cannabis was illegal (RRR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.95).

Why it matters

These findings identify key risk profiles—notably co-occurring substance use, mental health distress, and low risk perception—that can inform targeted clinical screening and prenatal counseling as cannabis access expands.

Limits

The cross-sectional design cannot establish causality or determine if cannabis use preceded or followed pregnancy recognition. All measures rely on self-reported survey data without biological validation (e.g., toxicology screening), creating potential for underreporting due to social desirability or legal concerns. Specific gestational timing, dosages, and fetal outcomes were not evaluated.

Cited by