García-Becerra · International journal of impotence research 2026 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=11,161 participants (41 RCTs)

Cardiovascular and prostate cancer risk associated to testosterone replacement therapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.

Cited 3 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials

PubMed 41673435 · doi:10.1038/s41443-026-01237-4 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42024603054) following PRISMA guidelines evaluated the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), prostate cancer events (PCaE), and clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPcE) associated with testosterone replacement therapy for late-onset hypogonadism. Searches in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central identified 41 randomized controlled trials covering 11,161 participants. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models, with meta-regression and zero-event continuity corrections.

What was found

Testosterone therapy was not associated with a significant increase in any primary risk outcome: - MACE: OR 0.83 (95% CI: 0.52–1.32; I² = 53.2%) - PCaE: OR 0.88 (95% CI: 0.52–1.51; I² = 0.0%) - CsPcE: OR 1.13 (95% CI: 0.39–3.26; I² = 0.0%) Meta-regression showed that baseline comorbidities contributed to heterogeneity observed in the MACE analysis.

Why it matters

These findings provide high-level trial evidence reassuring clinicians and patients that short- to mid-term testosterone replacement does not elevate cardiovascular or prostate cancer risk.

Limits

Moderate statistical heterogeneity was present in the MACE analysis (I² = 53.2%), influenced by variations in baseline participant comorbidities. The confidence intervals for prostate cancer outcomes remain relatively wide due to low total event counts, and the available RCT data primarily reflect short- to mid-term rather than multi-year or lifetime follow-up.

Cited by