Morton · The Journal of nutrition 2026 · narrative review · n=?

From Metabolism to Medals: Contemporary Perspectives and Revisiting Carbohydrate Guidelines for Fueling Endurance Athletes during Exercise.

Cited 4 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and expert opinion synthesizing mechanistic and performance literature without systematic review methodology.

PubMed 41759826 · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101442 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

This narrative review synthesizes historical and contemporary research on carbohydrate metabolism, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates, and sport-specific performance demands during prolonged endurance exercise (>2.5–3 h). The authors evaluate 2016 American College of Sports Medicine guidelines against emerging field practices and outline a personalized fueling model.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative trial data or pooled statistics. It states that while 2016 guidelines recommend carbohydrate intake ≤90 g/h, contemporary evidence indicates that trained athletes can increase exogenous and whole-body carbohydrate oxidation at intakes up to 120 g/h. Ingesting higher doses (120–200 g/h) currently lacks scientific substantiation.

Why it matters

This paper proposes revising standard sports nutrition practice by raising the recommended upper limit of intra-exercise carbohydrate fueling from 90 g/h to 120 g/h for trained endurance competitors.

Limits

This is a narrative review incorporating practitioner insights rather than a systematic review or randomized trial. The abstract provides no sample sizes or effect sizes. Doses exceeding 120 g/h remain unsubstantiated, and the authors note a scarcity of research in female athletes and ecologically valid settings.

Cited by