Okumura · The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science 2026 · nationwide within-individual cohort study · n=315046

Real-world effectiveness of mono- and combination therapies of mood stabilisers and antipsychotics in bipolar disorder: nationwide, within-individual study of 315 046 patients.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Nationwide observational cohort study using a within-individual design

PubMed 42057566 · doi:10.1192/bjp.2026.10636 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

A nationwide, population-based cohort study evaluated 315,046 adult patients (aged ≥20 years) with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder treated in psychiatric settings in Japan between April 2013 and March 2022, followed through May 2023 (median follow-up 7.1 years). Using a within-individual design and stratified Cox regression, the authors compared time to psychiatric hospitalisation across periods of mood stabiliser monotherapy, antipsychotic monotherapy, and combination regimens versus non-use or lithium monotherapy.

What was found

During follow-up, 83,621 patients (26.5%) were hospitalised. Compared with non-use of mood stabilisers, monotherapy reduced hospitalisation: lithium (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.66–0.68), valproate (aHR 0.71, 95% CI 0.70–0.73), lamotrigine (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.69–0.75), and carbamazepine (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70–0.78). Antipsychotic monotherapies also reduced risk relative to non-use, including aripiprazole (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70–0.75) and zotepine (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69–0.79). Compared with lithium monotherapy, combination therapy further reduced hospitalisation risk when combining lithium with carbamazepine (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64–0.83), zotepine (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.93), aripiprazole (aHR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.92), or valproate (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.97).

Why it matters

This study provides large-scale, real-world evidence comparing specific monotherapies and combination regimens for bipolar disorder, demonstrating that select combination therapies offer incremental protection against psychiatric admission beyond lithium alone.

Limits

The analysis is observational and subject to potential time-varying confounding by indication or illness severity, despite the within-individual design. Outcomes were restricted to psychiatric hospitalisation rather than symptom severity, functional recovery, or adverse drug effects, and data were limited to administrative claims from a single country (Japan).

Cited by