DiTulio · Frontiers in endocrinology 2026 · retrospective observational cohort study · n=188

Clearance of multiple antibiotic-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci is selectively associated with higher circulating α-melanocyte stimulating hormone in patients evaluated for chronic inflammatory response syndrome.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study evaluating biomarker changes across two timepoints.

PubMed 42077435 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1728408 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Retrospective observational cohort study of 188 adult patients evaluated for chronic inflammatory response syndrome (CIRS) at a single clinical site. Each participant had data across two timepoints for sinonasal culture status of multiple antibiotic-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MARCoNS) and circulating levels of α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9), and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP). Longitudinal biomarker changes were evaluated using mixed-effects modeling.

What was found

Across the total cohort, α-MSH increased by an estimated 10 pg/mL, MMP-9 decreased by 398 ng/mL, and VIP increased by 20 pg/mL between baseline and follow-up. Mixed-effects modeling identified a significant timepoint-by-MARCoNS interaction for α-MSH, showing that patients who achieved negative MARCoNS cultures at follow-up had higher circulating α-MSH concentrations than those who remained culture-positive. No significant interaction with MARCoNS status was observed for MMP-9 or VIP. Exact p-values and confidence intervals were not reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

Provides quantitative longitudinal evidence linking the clearance of sinonasal MARCoNS colonization to rising systemic α-MSH levels in patients evaluated for chronic multisystem illness.

Limits

Retrospective single-center design prevents causal inference. The abstract omits exact p-values, confidence intervals, treatment regimens received between timepoints, and the duration between baseline and follow-up. Additionally, the clinical definition of CIRS remains contested and non-standardized across broader medical practice.

Cited by