Eriksen · Appetite 2026 · cross-sectional study · n=11152

Evidence for a protein leverage effect on food intake in a Norwegian population.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional population-based study

PubMed 42102975 · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2026.108581 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This pre-registered cross-sectional study examined the protein leverage hypothesis using data from 11,152 participants aged 40–99 years in the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study (2015–2016) in Norway. Regression analyses evaluated associations between habitual dietary protein intake, total energy intake, BMI, and ultra-processed food (UPF) proportion.

What was found

Total energy intake was negatively associated with dietary protein proportion (L = -0.36, p < .001) and positively associated with dietary fat (L = 0.33, p < .001). Total energy intake showed no positive association with BMI, precluding testing of protein leverage on BMI. Proportion of UPFs was positively associated with total energy intake (b = 554, p < .001), negatively associated with dietary protein proportion (b = -2.0, p < .001), and positively associated with BMI (b = 0.011, p = .026).

Why it matters

This paper provides population-level evidence consistent with the protein leverage hypothesis, indicating that lower protein density and higher UPF intake correlate with increased total caloric consumption.

Limits

The cross-sectional design cannot establish causality. Dietary data rely on self-report, which is susceptible to misreporting. The lack of an association between total energy intake and BMI prevented assessment of protein leverage effects on body weight, and findings from middle-to-older aged Norwegians may not generalize to other populations.

Cited by