Shao · Frontiers in public health 2026 · systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=2,187 participants across 17 RCTs

Effects of exercise interventions on cognitive function in sedentary adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 42221635 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1794345 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (searched through December 2025) evaluated the cognitive effects of exercise interventions (aerobic, resistance, multicomponent) versus sedentary controls in sedentary adults. Global cognition and executive function were analyzed via network meta-analysis and ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Memory function was evaluated via standard random-effects pairwise meta-analysis. Effect sizes were computed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

What was found

Seventeen RCTs comprising 2,187 sedentary adults were analyzed. For global cognitive function, multicomponent exercise ranked highest (SUCRA = 88.5%), followed by aerobic (58.3%) and resistance exercise (48.5%). For executive function, aerobic exercise ranked highest (SUCRA = 90.8%), followed by multicomponent (50.7%) and resistance exercise (38.1%). For memory function, exercise did not show a statistically significant benefit compared to control (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.68). GRADE evaluation showed direct comparisons had moderate certainty, whereas most indirect and mixed network comparisons had very low certainty.

Why it matters

These findings suggest that exercise-induced cognitive benefits in sedentary adults are domain-specific, supporting tailored prescriptions such as aerobic exercise for executive control and multicomponent training for broader cognitive support.

Limits

Certainty of evidence was rated very low for most indirect and mixed comparisons under the GRADE framework. Memory outcomes lacked a connected network and showed imprecise estimates crossing the null. Specific exercise parameters (dose, frequency, duration) and detailed participant characteristics were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by