Lopez-Escamez · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2026 · expert consensus / conceptual framework · n=?

Sound hypersensitivity phenotypes and sound hypersensitivity disorder.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Expert consensus and theoretical framework proposing diagnostic criteria without original empirical data

PubMed 42269959 · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106796 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

An international, multidisciplinary working group developed a theoretical framework and proposed operational diagnostic criteria to define sound hypersensitivity and distinguish it from sound hypersensitivity disorder and related conditions like tinnitus.

What was found

The abstract reports no empirical or numerical data. The working group defined sound hypersensitivity across five specific phenotypes—loudness hypersensitivity (hyperacusis), noxacusis, misophonia, phonophobia, and noise-induced cognitive symptoms—and defined sound hypersensitivity disorder as a syndrome characterized by recurrent sound-induced symptoms leading to negative emotional responses, avoidance behaviors, and social or occupational impairment.

Why it matters

This framework establishes a standardized nomenclature to differentiate distinct sound hypersensitivity phenotypes from each other and from tinnitus, providing a common baseline for future clinical and pathophysiological research.

Limits

The publication is an expert consensus proposal and narrative review rather than an empirical study; it provides no primary patient data, epidemiological validation, or prospective testing of the proposed diagnostic criteria.

Cited by