Kaufman · Journal of neural transplantation & plasticity 1993 · Animal experimental transplantation study · n=?

Effect of transplanting suprachiasmatic nuclei from donors of different ages into completely SCN lesioned hamsters.

Cited 18 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Non-human animal experimental study

PubMed 7948177 · doi:10.1155/NP.1993.257 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Researchers transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) tissue harvested from golden hamster donors of varying developmental ages (embryonic day 11 through postnatal day 12) into completely SCN-lesioned, arrhythmic adult hamsters to determine the donor age window viable for functional restoration of circadian wheel-running rhythms. They also examined graft histology for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) immunoreactivity.

What was found

SCN grafts harvested across an 18-day developmental window—from embryonic day 11 to postnatal day 12—successfully restored circadian rhythmicity in arrhythmic host animals. The latency period between transplantation and the recovery of rhythmicity was independent of donor age. Graft success correlated with the presence of VIP-immunoreactive cell patches, whereas the absence of these cells correlated with graft failure. The abstract reports no numerical sample sizes, success rates, or latency durations.

Why it matters

This study demonstrates that viable SCN graft tissue can be harvested over an extended developmental timeframe extending well into the postnatal period, rather than being restricted to a narrow embryonic window.

Limits

The abstract provides no quantitative data, including total sample size, number of animals tested per age group, proportion of successful grafts, or exact latency periods. Findings are restricted to an animal model (golden hamsters) and wheel-running behavior, with unmeasured long-term physiological outcomes.

Cited by