de Wardener · Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux 1996 · narrative review · n=?

[Sodium and hypertension].

Cited 18 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and historical overview without systematic review methodology or primary data

PubMed 8952809 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

This is a narrative review synthesizing evolutionary history, animal experiments (in rats, dogs, rabbits, baboons, and chimpanzees), and human population studies to examine the relationship between dietary sodium intake, renal sodium handling, and essential hypertension.

What was found

The abstract states that ancestral human diets contained approximately 15 mmol/day of sodium (1 g salt) compared to modern intakes of approximately 150 mmol/day (9–12 g salt), and notes that populations consuming less than 60 mmol/day do not develop hypertension. Increased sodium intake is reported to raise blood pressure across multiple animal species and humans. Hypertensive rat strains and humans with essential hypertension share renal functional abnormalities that impair sodium excretion. No statistical effect sizes, variance measures, or primary trial data are reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

The paper outlines the conceptual framework linking modern high-salt diets to essential hypertension via evolutionary maladaptation and renal sodium retention mechanisms.

Limits

As a non-systematic narrative review, it presents no original empirical data, sample sizes, search strategy, or quantitative synthesis of study outcomes.

Cited by