Feldman · The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 1997 · Controlled animal experimental and neuroanatomical tracing study · n=?

An anatomical basis for visual calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl's midbrain.

Cited 113 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Animal bench research and neuroanatomical tracing (CEBM Level 5).

PubMed 9254692 · doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-17-06820.1997 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Researchers investigated the anatomical projections connecting the lateral shell of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICCls) to the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICX) in barn owls. Retrograde neuroanatomical tracing using biotinylated dextran amine was evaluated across three groups: juvenile owls prior to prism attachment, normal adult owls, and owls reared with prismatic spectacles that shifted the visual field in azimuth.

What was found

The abstract reports qualitative anatomical patterns without numerical values. In normal juveniles and adults, retrograde labeling showed a topographic projection where each ICX site received inputs from a restricted region of the ICCls with similar interaural time difference (ITD) tuning. In prism-reared owls, retrograde labeling was systematically altered: each ICX site received additional, abnormal inputs from ICCls regions whose ITD tuning matched the shifted ITD tuning of the ICX neurons.

Why it matters

This paper shows that developmental visual calibration of the auditory space map involves physical axonal rewiring and structural reorganization in midbrain pathways, rather than purely functional changes in preexisting connections.

Limits

The abstract provides no sample size (n is unstated) and reports no quantitative measurements or effect sizes. As an animal study using an avian model subjected to artificial visual distortion, direct translation to mammalian sensory plasticity is indirect, and retrograde tracing reflects structural anatomy rather than direct synaptic physiology.

Cited by