Jeremy Hugh Baron · Nutrition Reviews 2009 · historical narrative review · n=?

Sailors' scurvy before and after James Lind - a reassessment

Cited 132 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative historical review without systematic search methodology or new empirical human data (graded by design analogy).

OpenAlex W1972219331 · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00205.x · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Narrative historical review reassessing the history of sailors' scurvy, the use of citrus fruits for prevention and treatment, James Lind's 1747 controlled trial, the recurrence of scurvy after the substitution of lime juice in the 1860s, and recent revisionist historiographical critiques of the canonical account.

What was found

The abstract reports no empirical data or statistical findings. It summarizes the historical progression from early empirical use of oranges and lemons to Lind's 1747 trial, the later adoption of citrus by the British Navy, the 19th-century resurgence of scurvy during polar explorations due to lime-juice substitution, and the 20th-century identification and synthesis of ascorbic acid (vitamin C).

Why it matters

Contextualizes the history of clinical trials and nutritional deficiency science by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the traditional narrative surrounding James Lind.

Limits

As a narrative historical overview, it contains no new clinical, epidemiological, or quantitative empirical data, and the abstract outlines no systematic review methodology.

Cited by