Jose Martinez-Badía · World Journal of Psychiatry 2015 · narrative historical review · n=?

Who says this is a modern disorder? The early history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Cited 40 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative historical review of medical literature

OpenAlex W2267741946 · doi:10.5498/wjp.v5.i4.379 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The author conducted a narrative historical review of medical literature, textbooks, and non-scientific historical sources prior to the 20th century to trace early clinical descriptions and conceptual roots of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) before George Still's 1902 lectures.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative data or statistical analyses. The earliest identified medical reports of pathological inattention, distractibility, and hyperactivity date to late 18th-century mental disease textbooks by Melchior Adam Weikard and Sir Alexander Crichton. In the 19th century, multiple European physicians (including Charles West, Thomas C Albutt, Thomas S Clouston, William W Ireland, John Haslam, Heinrich Neumann, and Désiré-Magloire Bourneville) provided clinical depictions of patients whose symptoms align with modern diagnostic conceptualizations of ADHD.

Why it matters

This historical review demonstrates that ADHD-like symptom complexes were documented in medical textbooks over two centuries ago, challenging the perception that the disorder is purely a product of modern society or late-20th-century psychiatry.

Limits

The abstract describes a narrative historical review without defined search criteria, source counts, or systematic methodology. Retrospective interpretation of centuries-old clinical descriptions cannot confirm modern diagnostic criteria or differentiate ADHD from confounding neurological or psychiatric conditions.

Cited by