Sophie L. Newman · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 2016 · Cross-sectional bioarchaeological comparative study · n=403

Dedicated Followers of Fashion? Bioarchaeological Perspectives on Socio-Economic Status, Inequality, and Health in Urban Children from the Industrial Revolution (18th-19th C), England

Cited 71 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Level by design analogy for historical bioarchaeological research (cross-sectional skeletal comparative study).

OpenAlex W2338054398 · doi:10.1002/oa.2531 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Researchers conducted a bioarchaeological skeletal analysis of 403 juvenile individuals (aged 0–17 years) buried between approximately 1712 and 1854 across four London cemeteries representing different socioeconomic strata: Chelsea Old Church (high status), St Benet Sherehog (middle status), Bow Baptist (middle status), and Cross Bones (low status). Skeletal metrics evaluated included long bone diaphyseal length, cortical thickness, vertebral neural canal size, and pathological markers of physiological stress.

What was found

The abstract does not provide exact numerical values, effect sizes, or p-values. Directionally, children from the low-status Cross Bones assemblage exhibited deficient growth markers across development. However, infants from the high-status Chelsea Old Church assemblage also demonstrated poor growth values during early life, suggesting that elite infant-care customs (such as artificial feeding or minimal outdoor exposure) caused health impairments distinct from the general deprivation observed in lower-status groups.

Why it matters

This study provides physical evidence of social and health stratification during the Industrial Revolution, demonstrating that wealth did not completely protect infants from developmental stress, likely due to period-specific cultural and child-rearing practices.

Limits

The abstract reports no numerical data, confidence intervals, or test statistics. Skeletal samples suffer from the osteological paradox (skeletons represent only those who died at a given age, not necessarily the healthy living population). Socioeconomic status assignment relies on cemetery site historical proxies rather than individual-level historical records.

Cited by