Przemysław Gumiela · Zeszyty Prawnicze 2016 · historical textual analysis · n=?

DIDOMI POLEITEIAN ROMAION. TREŚĆ I ZAKRES NADANIA OBYWATELSTWA W CONSTITUTIO ANTONINIANA

Cited 1 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Level 5 by design analogy (historical legal textual analysis and scholarly interpretation, not clinical CEBM)

OpenAlex W2580368629 · doi:10.21697/zp.2010.10.1.07 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

The author performed a systematic legal and textual analysis of surviving ancient sources, focusing primarily on the Greek text preserved in the fragmentary *Papyrus Giessensis 42*, to evaluate the legal essence and scope of Roman citizenship granted under the *Constitutio Antoniniana* (Edict of Caracalla, 212 CE).

What was found

The abstract provides no quantitative metrics or specific textual reconstructions. It notes that while Ulpian described the edict as making inhabitants of the Roman world Roman citizens, the poor physical condition of *Papyrus Giessensis 42* and the brevity of ancient testimonies leave key questions regarding the exact content and legal limits of the grant unresolved.

Why it matters

This legal-historical analysis contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate regarding how universally Roman citizenship was extended across the empire in 212 CE and how the damaged primary papyrological evidence should be interpreted.

Limits

The abstract reports no empirical or quantitative data. Analysis is constrained by the heavily degraded and fragmentary state of the primary source (*P. Giss. 42*) and intentionally excludes broader historical contextual factors such as the imperial motives, surrounding political circumstances, and downstream societal consequences of the edict.

Cited by