Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations
Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data
Narrative review / expert opinion without systematic review methodology (graded by design analogy)
OpenAlex W2890839560 · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
What was done
The authors reviewed the theoretical and empirical literature on evolved human mate preferences, sexual strategies, and their behavioral manifestations. The narrative synthesis addressed sex differences and similarities across short-term and long-term mating contexts, shifts driven by social and ecological variables (such as mate value, sex ratio, and cultural norms), and the application of preferences in real-world decisions.
What was found
The abstract reports no numerical findings, statistical metrics, or effect sizes. It qualitatively describes evidence that evolved preferences influence attraction and retention tactics, deception, cues to fertility and resources, competitor derogation, breakups, and remarriage.
Why it matters
This review provides an overarching evolutionary framework synthesizing how adaptive psychological mechanisms interact with modern social and cultural contexts to guide human mating behavior.
Limits
The abstract provides no empirical data, sample sizes, or formal systematic review protocol. As a narrative review, it lacks quantitative meta-analytic pooling and is susceptible to selective study inclusion.
Cited by
- supports Men's wealth strongly predicts their likelihood of getting married, staying married, having children, and remarrying, whereas women's physical attractiveness is a stronger predictor of marriage and partner wealth than men's attractiveness.