Travis Colbourne · uO Research (University of Ottawa) 2021 · historical textual analysis · n=?

Reconstructing Justinian’s Reconquest of the West without Procopius

Cited 1 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Level 5 by design analogy: qualitative historical textual analysis and narrative comparison.

OpenAlex W3177137253 · doi:10.20381/ruor-26553 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

This thesis analyzed historical sources documenting Roman Emperor Justinian’s military campaigns in Italy, Spain, and North Africa without relying on Procopius. The author evaluated alternative contemporary and near-contemporary texts, including Jordanes' *Romana* and *Getica*, Victor of Tonnuna's *Chronicle*, Corippus' epic poetry, and the *Chronicle* of Marcellinus Comes (and its continuations). The analysis examined the provenance, dating, author backgrounds, and potential biases of these works, subsequently comparing them to Procopius' account to identify narrative and factual gaps that emerge in his absence.

What was found

The abstract provides no quantitative metrics. It reports qualitatively that without Procopius' detailed narrative, modern historians would be left with a cursory, bland record of Justinian's western wars, making precise chronological reconstruction difficult despite partial narratives provided by authors such as Jordanes.

Why it matters

This analysis clarifies the degree to which modern historiography of sixth-century Roman military history depends on a single primary author (Procopius) and highlights the specific limitations and perspectives of surviving alternative texts.

Limits

The study is an academic thesis limited strictly to textual and historiographical comparison of a small set of surviving written sources. As a qualitative historical analysis, it is subject to interpretative subjectivity, and the abstract does not incorporate archaeological or numismatic evidence.

Cited by