Sarah K. Cowan · Social Forces 2022 · natural experiment · n=?

Examining the Effects of a Universal Cash Transfer on Fertility

Cited 32 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Natural experiment design exploiting exogenous policy variation (by design analogy, not clinical CEBM)

OpenAlex W4210930350 · doi:10.1093/sf/soac013 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Authors analyzed the effect of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend—an annual unconditional cash payment provided to all Alaska residents since 1982—on fertility and abortion rates. The study exploited exogenous annual variation in dividend payment amounts over time to estimate reproductive responses across the state's population.

What was found

Cash transfer payments increased short-term fertility rates 1 and 2 years after disbursement, with the largest effect observed for first births and among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Standardized to the 2010 household size distribution, two average payments compared to two minimum payments were predicted to increase the fertility rate from 80.03 to 86.53 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. The payments had no detectable effect on abortion rates.

Why it matters

It provides evidence that unconditional income supplements alleviate economic constraints on childbearing, temporarily increasing birth rates without altering abortion rates.

Limits

The abstract does not state the total sample size or specify whether aggregate vital statistics or individual-level microdata were used. It evaluates a single US state with unique economic and demographic characteristics, limiting generalizability, and does not report long-term effects on completed lifetime fertility.

Cited by