Elizabeth L. Jeglic · Sexual Abuse 2022 · cross-sectional survey · n=6632

The Nature and Scope of Educator Misconduct in K-12

Cited 21 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional survey study (graded by design analogy)

OpenAlex W4225282370 · doi:10.1177/10790632221096421 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

A retrospective cross-sectional survey evaluated experiences of educator sexual misconduct during Grades K-12 among 6,632 recent high school graduates from four U.S. states. The study assessed the prevalence and types of misconduct, perpetrator characteristics, student disclosure rates, grooming behaviors, and current psychosocial functioning.

What was found

Overall, 11.7% of the 6,632 participants reported experiencing at least one form of educator sexual misconduct during K-12. Sexual comments were reported by 11%, while other forms (such as receiving sexual photos/messages, kissing, sexual touching, or sexual intercourse/oral sex) were reported by <1%. Perpetrators were primarily male (85%) and academic teachers (63%), followed by coaches and gym teachers (20%). Students reporting misconduct were primarily female (72%). Formal disclosure to authorities occurred in only 4% of cases. Grooming behaviors included showing special attention (29%) and gift giving (12%). Those reporting misconduct showed significantly more difficulties in current psychosocial functioning.

Why it matters

This study provides updated multi-state data on educator sexual misconduct nearly 20 years after the 2004 Department of Education estimates, highlighting the ongoing prevalence of verbal misconduct and a very low rate of reporting to authorities.

Limits

The study relied on retrospective self-reports from high school graduates, which are subject to recall bias and non-response bias. The sample was restricted to four U.S. states, limiting national generalizability. Numerical values and effect sizes for psychosocial functioning outcomes were not reported in the abstract, and the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality.

Cited by