Simon Corcoran · Cambridge University Press eBooks 2005 · historical narrative analysis · n=?

Before Constantine

Cited 6 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Historical narrative analysis; Level 5 by design analogy to expert opinion/theory, not clinical CEBM.

OpenAlex W4249964235 · doi:10.1017/ccol0521818389.003 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

This historical narrative examines the diplomatic and military relations between the Roman Empire and Sasanian Persia in the third century AD, focusing on the capture of Emperor Valerian by Shapur I in 260 AD and the subsequent Roman victory by Caesar Galerius over King Narseh in 297 AD, utilizing historical accounts, inscriptions, and relief iconography from Naqsh-i Rustam and the Ka'ba-i Zardusht.

What was found

The text provides a qualitative historical synthesis without statistical or quantitative measurements. It details how the Persian defeat and capture of Valerian in 260 AD was answered in 297 AD by Galerius's decisive defeat of Narseh, illustrating the diplomatic exchanges and the symbolic reversal of fortune that restored Roman military and political authority under the First Tetrarchy.

Why it matters

The work contextualizes the shifting balance of power between Rome and Persia prior to Constantine, highlighting how Tetrarchic military victories repaired Roman imperial prestige following third-century crises.

Limits

The source is a narrative historical text relying on selective literary anecdotes and monumental iconography rather than quantitative or empirical data. The abstract provides no empirical sample sizes, systematic historiographical methodology, or comparative archaeological datasets.

Cited by