Audrey Cougnard‐Grégoire · Ophthalmology and Therapy 2023 · narrative review · n=?

Blue Light Exposure: Ocular Hazards and Prevention—A Narrative Review

Cited 183 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing preclinical mechanisms and clinical observations without systematic pooling

OpenAlex W4321352124 · doi:10.1007/s40123-023-00675-3 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

This narrative review searched PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar for English-language articles published up to December 2022. It evaluated the ocular hazards of blue light exposure from LEDs and digital devices across ocular tissues and reviewed the efficacy of protective measures, including blue-blocking lenses, dietary macular pigments (lutein and zeaxanthin), and antioxidants.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative values or effect sizes. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo models show blue light can induce photochemical damage in the cornea, lens, and retina depending on intensity and wavelength. However, current evidence does not demonstrate that typical domestic LED use or digital screen exposure causes retinotoxicity in humans. Furthermore, evidence is lacking to support a beneficial effect of blue-blocking lenses in preventing ocular diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Macular pigments (lutein, zeaxanthin) and antioxidants (vitamins C, E, zinc) reduce oxidative stress or filter blue light and are associated with lower risks of AMD and cataract.

Why it matters

The review clarifies that ordinary consumer exposure to LEDs and screens has not been shown to cause retinal damage, and common commercial countermeasures like blue-filtering glasses lack clinical evidence for disease prevention.

Limits

As a narrative review, it lacks systematic search screening, risk-of-bias evaluation, and meta-analytic pooling. The abstract reports no quantitative metrics or counts of included studies, and notes that long-term cumulative exposure and dose-response effects remain unknown.

Cited by