William J. Ripple · Global Ecology and Conservation 2025 · longitudinal ecological study · n=?

The strength of the Yellowstone trophic cascade after wolf reintroduction

Cited 22 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Level assigned by design analogy (non-clinical longitudinal observational study with historical baseline).

OpenAlex W4406362628 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03428 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Researchers evaluated the strength of a large carnivore-induced trophic cascade in northern Yellowstone National Park from 2001 to 2020 following the 1995–1996 reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus). They examined riparian willows (Salix spp.) under reduced browsing pressure from Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis). Primary producer response was indexed by willow crown volume (a proxy for above-ground biomass) calculated from a predictive model based on plant height. The log10 response ratio was calculated to quantify cascade strength and benchmarked against a global meta-analysis.

What was found

Data across the 20-year monitoring period showed an approximate 1500% increase in average willow crown volume and a log10 response ratio of 1.21. This ratio was higher than 82% of response ratios reported in a global meta-analysis of trophic cascades.

Why it matters

The findings demonstrate that restoring apex predators can drive substantial long-term recovery of riparian vegetation. The study underscores that ecosystem responses can be gradual and non-linear, highlighting the necessity of multi-decade monitoring.

Limits

The abstract does not report the sample size (number of willow plants, plots, or stream reaches sampled) or statistical error bounds/confidence intervals. Biomass was not measured directly but estimated from a height-based predictive model, and the study lacks an external concurrent control system.

Cited by