Sustainability, natural and organic cosmetics: consumer, products, efficacy, toxicological and regulatory considerations
Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data
Narrative review and commentary with no primary empirical data or systematic review methodology
OpenAlex W920952392 · doi:10.1590/s1984-82502015000100002
What was done
The authors reviewed considerations surrounding sustainable, natural, and organic cosmetic products, focusing on consumer demand, packaging impacts, certifying agency frameworks, and the requirements for efficacy and toxicological testing of bioactive natural ingredients.
What was found
The abstract reports no numerical or empirical data. It notes an absence of harmonization among regulatory and certifying agency guidelines, leading individual cosmetic manufacturers to establish disparate formulation and packaging practices, and underscores that biologically active natural ingredients require formal toxicological and efficacy validation.
Why it matters
This review outlines the regulatory fragmentation in the sustainable cosmetics industry and emphasizes that natural claims do not obviate the need for standardized safety and performance evaluations.
Limits
The paper is a non-systematic narrative review providing no primary experimental data, quantitative comparisons, or methodological search details. No sample sizes or statistical findings are presented.
Cited by
- context Unlike USDA organic foods, personal care and cleaning products can be labeled organic while containing only a single organic ingredient and 99.9% non-organic ingredients.