Huberman Lab · 2025-09-29 · Andrew Huberman (host), Poppy Crum

Enhance Your Learning Speed & Health Using Neuroscience Based Protocols | Dr. Poppy Crum

41 research-tied claims examined: 2 contradicted 2 overstated 2 context 33 supported 2 unverified

2 Contradicted by research
2:18:36Poppy Crumcontradictedmoderate

Moths possess acoustic meta-reflector structures on their bodies that deflect and dampen incident echolocation energy from bats.

"their body is reflecting—meta-reflectors, effectively, so that the bat may put out its call and it deflects the energy of the call away from its body. So you're deflecting it away from critical critical areas." (said at 2:18:36)

While moth wings and thoracic scales are recognized in biomechanics as natural acoustic metamaterials that provide acoustic camouflage against bat biosonar, their mechanism is broadband sound absorption (damping), not reflection or deflection. Published experimental studies show that moth thoracic and wing scales act as resonant, deep-subwavelength ultrasound absorbers that dissipate 67% to 72% of incident ultrasonic sound energy, explicitly operating by absorbing sound waves rather than reflecting or deflecting echoes away from the body.

2:26:47Poppy Crumcontradictedlow

Crickets possess bimodal auditory neurons with dual sensitivity peaks at 6 kHz and 40 kHz that elicit opposing deterministic behavioral responses.

"Crickets have bimodal neurons that have sort of peaks in two different frequency ranges for the same neuron. And each frequency range will elicit a completely different behavior. So you've got a peak at 6k and you've got a peak at 40k. And cricket—and this is the same neuron—cricket hears 40k from a speaker, run over to it because that's got to be my mate or something, and you hear 40k and they run away and it's very predictive behavior." (said at 2:26:47)

The speaker misattributes the behavioral responses and frequency associations. In crickets (such as Teleogryllus oceanicus), low frequencies (~4.5–5 kHz) correspond to conspecific calling songs and trigger positive phonotaxis (approaching a potential mate), whereas ultrasound (~20–40 kHz) corresponds to predatory bat biosonar and elicits negative phonotaxis (avoidance/evasion steering). Furthermore, these opposing behaviors are driven by distinct neural pathways: ascending interneuron 1 (AN1) is tuned to calling songs and mediates positive phonotaxis, while interneuron-1 (Int-1 / AN2) is specialized for ultrasound avoidance. Although some individual auditory interneurons (like Int-1 or ON1) receive input across 3–40 kHz, the same neuron does not independently switch to trigger mating approach at one peak and escape behavior at another.

Unverified means no publication matching the claim was located; it does not prove the claim false. Spotted an error? See the corrections policy - disputes from the people quoted are prioritized.