Binkley · Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 2010 · narrative review · n=?

Low vitamin D status: definition, prevalence, consequences, and correction.

Cited 190 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review without systematic methodology

PubMed 20511052 · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2010.02.008 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

This narrative review synthesized literature on vitamin D metabolism, evaluation methods via serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), diagnostic thresholds, population prevalence of deficiency, skeletal and nonskeletal clinical consequences, and supplementation strategies.

What was found

Optimal circulating 25(OH)D is defined as approximately 30 to 32 ng/mL or above, leaving an estimated three-quarters of US adults classified as having low levels. Reaching optimal status requires daily intakes of at least 1000 IU of vitamin D, with a low risk of toxicity. Supplementation with vitamin D3 may be superior to vitamin D2, though substantial inter-individual response variability exists. Causality between low status and nonskeletal morbidities remains unproven.

Why it matters

The review summarizes clinical rationale for defining vitamin D sufficiency at or above 30 to 32 ng/mL and supports higher daily baseline intake recommendations.

Limits

This is a narrative review with no systematic search criteria or pooled quantitative data provided in the abstract. Causality for nonskeletal outcomes is unestablished, optimal monitoring intervals are unaddressed, and precise sample sizes are not reported.

Cited by