Kim · Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2018 · narrative review · n=?

Update on maximal anabolic response to dietary protein.

Cited 83 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and theoretical derivation without systematic review methodology

PubMed 28807333 · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.05.029 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

The authors reviewed literature on net protein balance (synthesis minus breakdown) following dietary protein ingestion. They examined methodological issues in studies that proposed a 20–35 g maximal single-meal threshold based solely on muscle protein synthesis, and derived a theoretical model incorporating suppression of protein breakdown and whole-body tissue contributions.

What was found

The abstract reports no primary experimental data or quantitative effect sizes. Based on theoretical derivation and literature review, the authors concluded that a practical limit to the maximal anabolic response from a single meal is unlikely, and that maximizing 24-hour anabolism is best achieved by increasing protein intake at breakfast and lunch without reducing intake at dinner.

Why it matters

This review challenges the concept of a strict 20–35 g ceiling on per-meal protein utilization by emphasizing whole-body net protein balance over isolated muscle protein synthesis.

Limits

The publication is a narrative review and theoretical model rather than a primary clinical trial or systematic review. The abstract provides no quantitative experimental metrics or empirical validation of the suggested distribution strategy.

Cited by