Bellemare-Pepin · iScience 2022 · cross-sectional behavioral study · n=?

Processing visual ambiguity in fractal patterns: Pareidolia as a sign of creativity.

Cited 21 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional behavioral laboratory study; graded Level 4 by non-clinical design analogy.

PubMed 36164655 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105103 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

Participants completed a visual task requiring them to identify recognizable forms within ambiguous, cloud-like fractal images varying in image contrast and fractal dimension. Perceptual responses were evaluated across participants categorized by creativity levels to examine the link between creativity and visual pareidolia.

What was found

The abstract provides no numerical data, exact group sizes, or statistical effect metrics. Qualitatively, individuals classified as highly creative experienced pareidolic perceptions more frequently and more rapidly than less creative individuals. High-creatives also reported pareidolia across a broader range of image contrasts and fractal dimensions.

Why it matters

This work links creative ability to basic visual ambiguity resolution, proposing that divergent perception operates alongside traditional divergent thinking as a core component of human creativity.

Limits

The abstract does not disclose the sample size, participant demographics, statistical thresholds, or the specific validated measures used to classify participants as high or low in creativity. The cross-sectional design cannot establish whether divergent perceptual tendencies cause or merely correlate with creative aptitude.

Cited by