Stetson · Biology of reproduction 1986 · Controlled animal experiment · n=?

Sensitivity of adult male Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus sungorus) to melatonin injections throughout the day: effects on the reproductive system and the pineal.

Cited 69 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Animal laboratory study

PubMed 3790663 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod35.3.618 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

Adult male Djungarian hamsters (*Phodopus sungorus sungorus*) housed on a 16-hour light, 8-hour dark photoperiod (16L:8D) were divided into 24 groups. Each group received daily subcutaneous injections of melatonin (5 µg in 0.1 ml ethanolic saline) at a different single hour of the day for 15 weeks. At the end of 15 weeks, animals were sacrificed, testes were weighed to determine testicular regression, and the endogenous rhythm of pineal melatonin was assessed and compared against uninjected controls.

What was found

Two discrete windows of melatonin sensitivity were identified: a single time point 5 minutes before lights on (0455 h) and a 5-hour window in the late afternoon (1600–2100 h; lights out at 2100 h). Complete testicular regression occurred only in groups injected at 1700 h and 1800 h. In the 1900 h and 2000 h groups, some animals failed to respond or regressed slowly, whereas the 1600 h and 2100 h groups showed only partial regression after 15 weeks. Exogenous melatonin administration caused no demonstrable change in the endogenous pineal melatonin rhythm, which maintained duration and amplitude identical to uninjected controls. Exact numerical testicular weights and sample sizes per group were not reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

This study demonstrates that the physiological gonadal response to melatonin depends strictly on the circadian timing of administration rather than total exposure alone, while showing that exogenous melatonin does not necessarily reset or suppress endogenous pineal melatonin production.

Limits

The abstract does not state the total number of hamsters or sample sizes per group, nor does it provide quantitative values (means, standard deviations, or statistical test metrics) for testicular weights. Findings are from an animal model with highly specialized photoperiodic reproductive biology and cannot be directly translated to human reproductive or circadian physiology.

Cited by