Hoehne · Psychology and aging 2025 · Cross-sectional observational study · n=2062

Cross-sectional age differences in fading affect bias: A latent change score model approach.

Cited 2 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional observational study (graded by design analogy for non-clinical research)

PubMed 40372845 · doi:10.1037/pag0000900 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

A cross-sectional study evaluated how the fading affect bias—where negative emotional intensity fades faster than positive intensity in autobiographical memory—varies across the adult lifespan. A sample of 2,062 adults aged 18 to 96 years (60.67% women, 75.46% with university entrance diplomas, 95.68% German native speakers) completed a free recall task for three positive and three negative autobiographical memories. Participants rated affect intensity retrospectively for both the time of occurrence and current recall. Latent change score models were used to model affect intensity changes and an overall latent fading affect bias score while controlling for time since the event and initial affect intensity.

What was found

The magnitude of the fading affect bias followed a U-shaped function across age, with a low point at age 40 and a maximum at the oldest ages in the sample. Adjusting for time elapsed since the event and initial affect intensity further increased the bias observed at older ages. No specific numerical coefficients or effect sizes were reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

The study adds empirical support for socioemotional selectivity theory and the strength and vulnerability integration model, suggesting that emotional regulation processes that diminish negative memory affect are strongest in late adulthood.

Limits

The study is cross-sectional, confounding age differences with potential cohort effects. Ratings of initial emotional intensity were retrospective and assessed at the time of recall, creating potential recall bias. The sample was relatively homogeneous in language and had a high level of education.

Cited by