Eric Topol
Eric Topol is a medical researcher whose work focuses heavily on the application and evaluation of artificial intelligence and digital technologies across healthcare. His published research explores clinical AI foundation models, dynamic AI evaluation, robotic surgery, and biological aging clocks. Additionally, he has published studies on multi-cancer early detection, COVID-19 treatments, metabolic mechanisms in neurodegeneration, and appraisals of the wellness industry.
14 claims checked on air: 3 overstated 11 supported
What they said on air
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately half of all heart failure cases.
"preserve ejection fraction heart failure, which is half of all heart failure, right?" (said at 0:26:26)
Large population-based epidemiological studies establish that heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately 50% (roughly 45% to 55%) of all heart failure cases in clinical practice and community cohorts.
GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs reduce systemic inflammation independently of and prior to weight loss.
"We've already seen how GLP-1 drugs do that before any weight loss. So that should work well in people who aren't even obese." (said at 0:26:30)
Randomized clinical trials and translational research demonstrate that GLP-1 receptor agonists exert direct anti-inflammatory effects that occur acutely (even following a single dose) and independently of weight reduction. In human trials, GLP-1 receptor agonism rapidly downregulates reactive oxygen species generation, NF-κB binding, and proinflammatory cytokine expression (including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) as well as systemic markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein before or in the absence of significant weight loss.
- supports: Exenatide exerts a potent antiinflammatory effect. (The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2012) · cited 286x in the literature
"After a single injection of exenatide, there was a reduction by 20 ± 7% in free fatty acids, 19 ± 7% in reactive oxygen species generation, 39 ± 11% in nuclear factor-κB binding, 18 ± 9% in TNFα expression, 26 ± 7% in IL-1β expression... Exenatide exerts a rapid antiinflammatory effect at the cellular and molecular level. This may contribute to a potentially beneficial antiatherogenic effect. This effect was independent of weight loss." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Antiinflammatory actions of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies beyond metabolic benef… (The Journal of clinical investigation 2025) · cited 74x in the literature
"Acute and chronic activation of GLP-1 receptor signaling also reduces systemic and tissue inflammation in mice and humans, through weight loss-dependent and -independent mechanisms, actions that may contribute to the expanding spectrum of clinical benefits ascribed to GLP-1 medicines." (abstract, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
GLP-1 receptor agonist medications prevent or improve heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
"And we've seen how that can prevent heart—preserve ejection fraction heart failure, which is half of all heart failure, right? GLP-1s prevent that." (said at 0:26:40)
Large phase 3 randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide substantially improves symptoms, physical functioning, and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, once-weekly semaglutide significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-CSS) scores and 6-minute walk distance while reducing body weight compared with placebo in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. Furthermore, a pooled analysis of 3,743 participants across four randomized trials (STEP-HFpEF, STEP-HFpEF DM, SELECT, and FLOW) showed that semaglutide significantly reduced the risk of worsening heart failure events (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41–0.82) and composite cardiovascular death or heart failure events (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.89).
Artificial intelligence analysis of retinal photographs can predict the onset of Alzheimer's disease 5 to 7 years in advance.
"You can do a retina AI exam. So I have a picture of the retina and you do AI on it, and it tells you when you're going to have Alzheimer's, if you're going to have Alzheimer's 5 to 7 years in advance." (said at 0:27:20)
Large prospective cohort studies (including data from the UK Biobank) demonstrate that artificial intelligence and deep-learning models applied to retinal photographs or optical coherence tomography can identify retinal structural features and biological aging markers associated with an increased relative risk of developing Alzheimer's disease or dementia years (e.g., 5 to 12 years) before clinical diagnosis. However, framing this as a ready clinical exam that deterministically "tells you when you're going to have Alzheimer's, if you're going to have Alzheimer's" significantly overstates the evidence. Current AI retinal models quantify statistical risk and biological vulnerability in research cohorts; they are not clinically diagnostic or deterministic prognostic tests for individual patients.
- partial: A deep-learning retinal aging biomarker for cognitive decline and incident dementia. (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 2025) · cited 20x in the literature
"RetiPhenoAge, a retinal aging biomarker, was derived from retinal photographs using deep-learning... In the UK Biobank (N = 33 495), RetiPhenoAge similarly predicted incident dementia (SHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.41, p = 0.008)... RetiPhenoAge may provide a non-invasive prognostic screening tool for cognitive decline and dementia." (abstract, methods and results)
pubmedfull study (doi) - partial: Prediction of Alzheimer's disease risk factors from retinal images via deep learning: Deve… (Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 2026)
"Several saliency-based scores differed significantly between incident AD and matched controls, suggesting potential overlap between retinal correlates of AD-related risk factors and preclinical AD-associated changes. Conclusions: CFP encodes retinal signatures linked to AD risk factors. Although not diagnostic, DL-derived retinal representations may uncover biologically meaningful risk-related structural changes mirroring the potential AD vulnerability." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
AI analysis of retinal images can predict coronary artery calcium scores, stroke risk, and heart disease.
"The retina also tells if you're going to have heart disease or a stroke in advance. It will even tell if you're going to, um, you know, your calcium score of your heart arteries through your retina." (said at 0:27:40)
Published studies confirm that artificial intelligence and deep-learning models applied to retinal fundus photographs can predict coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, incident cardiovascular disease, and stroke risk. Deep-learning algorithms have demonstrated discrimination of high CAC scores (>100) from zero CAC with an AUROC of approximately 0.83. Furthermore, systematic reviews and cohort studies show that retinal microvascular biomarkers and AI retinal models predict future cardiovascular events (such as myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke) with predictive accuracy comparable to conventional clinical risk scores.
Pericoronary arterial inflammation detected by AI analysis on CT angiography in the absence of arterial narrowing is associated with up to a 15-fold increased risk of heart attack.
"No, no, the Cleerly and the other ones in the US don't do this, but this is a a a Oxford, University of Oxford spinout. I think it's called Caristo. They're going to have that available soon. And I went through the data in the book. I mean, they've had multiple papers, but it's striking. If you have inflammation without a narrow, it's, you know, you could have 15-fold risk of a heart attack." (said at 0:28:49)
The claim is supported by large prospective cohort data from University of Oxford researchers and the associated spinout technology (Caristo's AI-assisted perivascular Fat Attenuation Index [FAI] Score). In the ORFAN multicentre longitudinal cohort study published in The Lancet (2024), coronary inflammation measured by FAI Score on coronary CT angiography was evaluated in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Having high perivascular inflammation across coronary arteries was associated with a 12.6-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including myocardial infarction; HR 12.6, 95% CI 8.5–18.6) and a nearly 30-fold increased risk of cardiac mortality, independent of anatomical stenosis.
Adhering to comprehensive healthy lifestyle practices provides 7 to 10 additional years of life free from major age-related chronic diseases.
"show that if we practice the lifestyle factors that we've been reviewing with the details, um, that we we discussed, that gets us 7 to 10 years of healthy aging without one of these age-related diseases." (said at 0:29:50)
A prospective analysis of 111,562 participants from the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study investigated the impact of five low-risk lifestyle factors (a healthy diet, never smoking, ≥30 minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, moderate alcohol consumption, and a normal BMI). At age 50, women adhering to four or five healthy lifestyle factors had 34.4 years of life expectancy free of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer compared to 23.7 years for those with zero factors (a gain of 10.7 disease-free years). For men, the disease-free life expectancy at age 50 was 31.1 years versus 23.5 years (a gain of 7.6 disease-free years), directly supporting the claim of 7 to 10 additional years of life free from major chronic diseases.
Clinical trial data demonstrate that the lower LDL cholesterol is reduced, the greater the cardiovascular protection.
"Well, if you look at all the data, the lower you go, the more protection" (said at 0:31:12)
Large meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (such as the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration) and individual trial analyses (such as FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE) demonstrate a consistent, log-linear relationship where lower achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels yield progressively greater reductions in major cardiovascular events, without a discernible lower threshold for clinical efficacy down to very low LDL-C levels (<20 mg/dL).
- supports: Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data… (Lancet (London, England) 2010) · cited 6539x in the literature
"Further reductions in LDL cholesterol safely produce definite further reductions in the incidence of heart attack, of revascularisation, and of ischaemic stroke, with each 1·0 mmol/L reduction reducing the annual rate of these major vascular events by just over a fifth. There was no evidence of any threshold within the cholesterol range studied, suggesting that reduction of LDL cholesterol by 2-3 mmol/L would reduce risk by about 40-50%." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Association Between Achieved Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Long-Term Card… (Circulation 2023) · cited 185x in the literature
"There was a monotonic relationship between lower achieved LDL-C levels-down to very low levels <20 mg/dL-and a lower risk of the primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) that persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted P trend <0.0001 for each end points)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Statins cause severe leg cramps and muscle-related symptoms in patients.
"Some of the data that comes out of these big meta-analyses, which say, "Oh, people don't get any leg cramps." That's not true. You and I know that's not true. People do get severe leg cramps where they can't even sleep at night, you know, uh, and and all sorts of other, you know, leg, uh, and muscle-related symptoms." (said at 0:32:24)
While statin therapy is causally associated with a small excess rate of muscle pain or weakness, the severity and frequency attributed to statins are significantly overstated. A comprehensive individual participant data meta-analysis of 19 large double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials (n=123,940) by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration found that statins caused a small excess of mostly mild muscle symptoms during the first year of treatment (absolute excess of 11 events per 1,000 person-years; rate ratio 1.07). However, after the first year, there was no significant excess risk, and more than 90% of all muscle symptom reports among statin-treated participants were not attributable to the drug, occurring at near-identical rates in the placebo groups (nocebo/drucebo effect and background prevalence). Severe muscle damage (such as rhabdomyolysis or severe myopathy) is very rare.
Clinical data do not show that statins cause cognitive impairment or sexual dysfunction.
"Now, with respect to cognitive and, uh, sexual dysfunction, the data really don't show a hit there at all" (said at 0:32:45)
High-certainty evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses supports the claim that clinical data do not demonstrate a causal link between statin therapy and cognitive impairment or sexual dysfunction. A meta-analysis of individual participant data from 19 double-blind randomized trials encompassing 123,940 individuals found no evidence that statins cause cognitive impairment or other non-hepatic/non-muscular undesirable effects listed in product labels. Furthermore, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials evaluating lipid-lowering therapies (including statins) have found no significant association with neurocognitive disorders or global cognitive decline compared to placebo or control groups.
Alzheimer's disease accounts for 70% of dementia cases.
"and Alzheimer's, as you know, accounts for 70% of dementia" (said at 0:32:54)
Epidemiological consensus establishes that Alzheimer's disease is the leading cause of dementia, accounting for an estimated 60% to 70% of all dementia cases globally.
Failing to lower LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dL or 70 mg/dL places individuals at higher risk for dementia.
"if you don't have the LDL lowered to let's say less than 100, less than 70, you're going to be at higher risk for dementia." (said at 0:33:00)
While some observational cohort analyses find that individuals with LDL cholesterol levels below 70 mg/dL have lower rates of incident dementia compared to those with higher levels, randomized controlled trial evidence does not support the claim that actively lowering LDL cholesterol to specific targets (e.g., <100 or <70 mg/dL) reduces dementia risk. Cochrane systematic reviews of randomized trials evaluating statin-induced LDL lowering found no significant reduction in the incidence of dementia or Alzheimer's disease, and trial data from PCSK9 inhibitor studies similarly show no significant effect on dementia outcomes.
- contradicts: Statins for the prevention of dementia. (The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2009) · cited 193x in the literature
"There is good evidence from RCTs that statins given in late life to individuals at risk of vascular disease have no effect in preventing AD or dementia. Biologically it seems feasible that statins could prevent dementia due to their role in cholesterol reduction and initial evidence from observational studies was very promising. Indication bias may have been a factor in these studies however and the evidence from subsequent RCTs has been negative." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - partial: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and risk of incident dementia: a distributed ne… (Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 2025) · cited 10x in the literature
"The LDL-C levels below 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) were associated with a 26% reduction in the risk of all-cause dementia and a 28% reduction in the risk of ADRD, compared with levels above 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - contradicts: Association between PCSK9 targeted therapy and the risk of stroke and dementia: A meta-ana… (The American journal of medicine 2026)
"However, no significant association was observed for the risk of hemorrhagic stroke (OR, 1.16 (95%CI: 0.70-1.93), P = 0.56), transient ischemic attack (OR, 0.98 (95%CI: 0.48-2.06), P = 0.95), dementia (OR, 0.77 (95%CI: 0.14-4.28), P = 0.76), dementia of Alzheimer's type (OR, 0.81 (95%CI: 0.14-4.70), P = 0.82), and Parkinson's disease (OR, 0.82 (95%CI: 0.11-6.37), P = 0.85)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
High doses of potent statins like rosuvastatin and atorvastatin increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
"because if you take a very potent statin, you have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, right? ... high doses of rosuvastatin, Crestor, or atorvastatin, Lipitor, that could also raise the risk of that person developing type 2 diabetes." (said at 0:34:00)
Large meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials demonstrate that statin therapy—and particularly intensive-dose or high-potency statin regimens such as high-dose atorvastatin and rosuvastatin—is associated with a modest, statistically significant increase in the risk of developing new-onset type 2 diabetes. A 2011 meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials (32,752 participants) comparing intensive-dose to moderate-dose statin therapy found a 12% increased odds of incident diabetes (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04–1.22), representing roughly 2.0 additional cases of diabetes per 1,000 patient-years. This dose-dependent diabetogenic effect is well recognized, although guidelines emphasize that cardiovascular benefits generally outweigh this risk in indicated patients.
- supports: Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin … (Lancet (London, England) 2010) · cited 2464x in the literature
"Statin therapy was associated with a 9% increased risk for incident diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17), with little heterogeneity (I(2)=11%) between trials." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: … (JAMA 2011) · cited 1395x in the literature
"In 5 statin trials with 32,752 participants without diabetes at baseline, 2749 developed diabetes (1449 assigned intensive-dose therapy, 1300 assigned moderate-dose therapy, representing 2.0 additional cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient-years)... Odds ratios were 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.22; I(2) = 0%) for new-onset diabetes... In a pooled analysis of data from 5 statin trials, intensive-dose statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
PCSK9 inhibitor injectable medications are not associated with an increased risk of diabetes.
"the PCSK9 injectable drugs are a winner because they're potent and they have not been associated with diabetes" (said at 0:35:53)
Extensive randomized controlled trial evidence and systematic reviews demonstrate that injectable PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (such as evolocumab and alirocumab) do not increase the risk of new-onset diabetes or impair glycemic parameters (fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c), unlike statin therapy. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 trials comprising 65,861 participants evaluated this outcome with high certainty evidence and confirmed no increased risk of new-onset diabetes.
- supports: Effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies on n… (Diabetes, obesity & metabolism 2018) · cited 57x in the literature
"Alirocumab and evolocumab, two types of PCSK9-mAb approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, had no significant impact on NODM and glucose homeostasis, regardless of PCSK9-mAb type, participant characteristics, treatment duration, treatment method and differences in control treatment." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors and Ezetimibe on Risk of New-Onse… (Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics 2020) · cited 25x in the literature
"Participants randomized to PCSK9i did not differ from the control patients in diabetes incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99, P = .87, 95% CI = 0.92-1.07)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors: a systematic review and met… (Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2022) · cited 29x in the literature
"PCSK9 inhibitors do not increase the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus, neurocognitive events, cataracts or gastrointestinal haemorrhage with high certainty evidence." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Fact-checked episodes
Publications
- Multi-cancer early detection revisited: insights and lessons from the PATHFINDER 2 study.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Critically Appraising the Wellness Movement: Cost Without Value, A Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Trump one year on: How six US researchers plan to protect science amid chaos and cuts.Nature 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Obesity as a catalyst for neurodegeneration.Nature metabolism 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Decoding the language of sleep with artificial intelligence.Lancet (London, England) 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Understanding pre-training data effects in retinal foundation models using two large fundus cohorts.Nature communications 2026 · CEBM Level 3
- A clinical environment simulator for dynamic AI evaluation.Nature medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Generalist biological artificial intelligence in modeling the language of life.Nature biotechnology 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Mammography should include artificial intelligence support.Lancet (London, England) 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Digitising the thymus.Lancet (London, England) 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- COVID-19 Rebound in Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir Treatment and Control Groups: Prospective Cohort Study.Interactive journal of medical research 2026 · CEBM Level 3
- Large reasoning models as thinking machines for medicine.Nature biomedical engineering 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Evaluating the robustness and readiness of large frontier models in health AI applications.Nature medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 4
- Biological aging clocks in health and disease.Nature medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Humanoid robots in the operating room: a framework for staged integration of embodied AI in surgery.NPJ digital medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Toward a test of medical AI superintelligence.Nature medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- When physicians and AI work together, who is accountable? How to lay out medical liability.Nature 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- From Reactive Care to Predictive Prevention: Harnessing Technology to Transform Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Enabling equitable open access to commercially funded research publications.PLoS medicine 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- A clinical certification pathway for generalist medical AI systems.Lancet (London, England) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Advocating for a Master of Digital Health Degree.JAMA 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Learning the language of life with AI.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- The rise of agentic AI teammates in medicine.Lancet (London, England) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Artificial intelligence for modelling infectious disease epidemics.Nature 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Is generative artificial intelligence capable of clinical reasoning?Lancet (London, England) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Multimodal generative AI for medical image interpretation.Nature 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Coordinated AI agents for advancing healthcare.Nature biomedical engineering 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- A CRISPR/Cas9-based enhancement of high-throughput single-cell transcriptomics.Nature communications 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Master of Digital Health Degree-Reply.JAMA 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Predicting and preventing Alzheimer's disease.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- A Randomized Trial of At-Home COVID-19 Tests, Telemedicine, and Rapid Prescription Delivery for Immunocompromised Individuals.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Assessing generative artificial intelligence for mental health.Lancet (London, England) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- A Model for Rapid Innovation for Engagement, Enrollment, and Data and Sample Collection in a Diverse Cohort Study: Insights from All of Us Participant Labs.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health 2025 · CEBM Level 4
- The generative era of medical AI.Cell 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Beyond Assistance: The Case for Role Separation in AI-Human Radiology Workflows.Radiology 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Multimodal AI correlates of glucose spikes in people with normal glucose regulation, pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes.Nature medicine 2025 · CEBM Level 3
- Preserving clinical skills in the age of AI assistance.Lancet (London, England) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Catalyzing Health AI by Fixing Payment Systems.NEJM AI 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Toward the eradication of medical diagnostic errors.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- AI-Enhanced Reconstruction of the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram via 3-Leads with Accurate Clinical Assessment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences 2024 · CEBM Level 4
- Solving the puzzle of Long Covid.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- The clinical potential of counterfactual AI models.Lancet (London, England) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- The hospital at home in the USA: current status and future prospects.NPJ digital medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management.Cell metabolism 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Early detection of pancreatic cancer and AI risk partitioning.Lancet (London, England) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review.The Lancet. Digital health 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Genome sequence analyses identify novel risk loci for multiple system atrophy.Neuron 2024 · CEBM Level 4
- AI-enabled opportunistic medical scan interpretation.Lancet (London, England) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Artificial intelligence in surgery.Nature medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Medical forecasting.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Three-year outcomes of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.Nature medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 3
- Transforming Cardiovascular Care With Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Practice: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Academic Freedom in America - In Support of Institutional Voices.The New England journal of medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- AI-enhanced reconstruction of the 12-lead electrocardiogram via 3-leads with accurate clinical assessment.NPJ digital medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 3
- Digitising the ageing process with epigenetic clocks.Lancet (London, England) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Long COVID science, research and policy.Nature medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- The potential for large language models to transform cardiovascular medicine.The Lancet. Digital health 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Techquity: digital pathways to reach all people for medical research.Lancet (London, England) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist.The Lancet. Digital health 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- The revolution in high-throughput proteomics and AI.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- An ethics assessment tool for artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare: CARE-AI.Nature medicine 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- A randomized trial of at-home COVID-19 tests, telemedicine, and rapid prescription delivery for immunocompromised individuals.Research square 2024 · CEBM Level 2
- Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations.Nature reviews. Microbiology 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcare.Nature medicine 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Digitising tremor.Lancet (London, England) 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence.Nature 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Author Correction: Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations.Nature reviews. Microbiology 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Upending the model of AI adoption.Lancet (London, England) 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Rebooting cancer screening with artificial intelligence.Lancet (London, England) 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Features Associated With Incident and Prevalent Parkinson Disease.Neurology 2023 · CEBM Level 3
- A foundation model for generalizable disease detection from retinal images.Nature 2023 · CEBM Level 4
- As artificial intelligence goes multimodal, medical applications multiply.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- The Initial Steps of Multimodal AI in Radiology.Radiology 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Machines and empathy in medicine.Lancet (London, England) 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Digitising the outbreak.Lancet (London, England) 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- It's not too late.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- AI in health and medicine.Nature medicine 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Bridging the chasm between AI and clinical implementation.Lancet (London, England) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Impact of polygenic risk communication: an observational mobile application-based coronary artery disease study.NPJ digital medicine 2022 · CEBM Level 3
- AlzEye: longitudinal record-level linkage of ophthalmic imaging and hospital admissions of 353 157 patients in London, UK.BMJ open 2022 · CEBM Level 3
- Digitising the prediction and management of sepsis.Lancet (London, England) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- 6 month serologic response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers.PloS one 2022 · CEBM Level 3
- Inter-individual variation in objective measure of reactogenicity following COVID-19 vaccination via smartwatches and fitness bands.NPJ digital medicine 2022 · CEBM Level 3
- Deep learning a person's risk of sudden cardiac death.Lancet (London, England) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Public Misinformation and Science Communication in Times of Public Health Crises.Clinical chemistry 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Smartphone apps in the COVID-19 pandemic.Nature biotechnology 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Digitising heart transplant rejection.Lancet (London, England) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Operation Nasal Vaccine-Lightning speed to counter COVID-19.Science immunology 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- The digital phenotype of vaccination.Nature biotechnology 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Self-supervised learning in medicine and healthcare.Nature biomedical engineering 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Multimodal biomedical AI.Nature medicine 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Digitising brain age.Lancet (London, England) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Sensor-based surveillance for digitising real-time COVID-19 tracking in the USA (DETECT): a multivariable, population-based, modelling study.The Lancet. Digital health 2022 · CEBM Level 3
- The Promise of Digital Health: Then, Now, and the Future.NAM perspectives 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Variant-proof vaccines - invest now for the next pandemic.Nature 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Annals of internal medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- What's lurking in your electrocardiogram?Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Assessing the human immune response to SARS-CoV-2 variants.Nature medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Conquering Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease - 50 Years of Progress.The New England journal of medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Messenger RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.Cell 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- AI-facilitated health care requires education of clinicians.Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- The Physiologic Response to COVID-19 Vaccination.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences 2021 · CEBM Level 3
- Artificial intelligence, bias, and patients' perspectives.Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Has SARS-CoV-2 reached peak fitness?Nature medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Cardiac rehabilitation in the digital era.Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Assessment of Prolonged Physiological and Behavioral Changes Associated With COVID-19 Infection.JAMA network open 2021 · CEBM Level 3
- Radiation oncology 2.0.Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- The Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 Infections That Are Asymptomatic.Annals of internal medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Three year clinical outcomes in a nationwide, observational, siteless clinical trial of atrial fibrillation screening-mHealth Screening to Prevent Strokes (mSToPS).PloS one 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Digitising the vision test.Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- From mRNA sensing to vaccines.Immunity 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Readiness for mammography and artificial intelligence.Lancet (London, England) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Passive detection of COVID-19 with wearable sensors and explainable machine learning algorithms.NPJ digital medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 3
- COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections.Science (New York, N.Y.) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- More than meets the eye: Using AI to identify reduced heart function by electrocardiograms.Med (New York, N.Y.) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Healthcare resource utilization following ECG sensor patch screening for atrial fibrillation.Heart rhythm O2 2020 · CEBM Level 3