DavidPerlmutterMD · 2024-01-29 · David Perlmutter (host), Susan Magsamen, Ivy Ross
Your Brain on Art: The Science of Creativity and Neurological Health | Ivy Ross & Susan Magsamen
24 research-tied claims examined: 6 overstated 5 context 8 supported 5 unverified
5 No source found (not proven false)
Research on the Apollo Neuro device shows an average 11% increase in heart rate variability.
"11% increase in heart rate variability on average" (said at 0:13:54)
No published record matching the claim of an average 11% increase in heart rate variability from the Apollo Neuro device was located; this does not prove the claim false. Published peer-reviewed research on the device has evaluated outcomes such as sleep duration, student burnout, and anxiety, but none report a verified 11% average increase in heart rate variability.
Research on the Apollo Neuro device shows up to 25% improvement in focus and concentration.
"and up to 25% more focus and concentration." (said at 0:13:54)
No published record matching the claim that the Apollo Neuro device improves focus and concentration by up to 25% was located; this does not prove the claim false. Published peer-reviewed research on the device has evaluated outcomes related to total sleep duration, anxiety symptoms, and occupational burnout in student populations, but published clinical trials validating a 25% increase in focus or concentration were not found.
Engaging in art enhances the brain's production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).
"art actually does enhance the brain's production of BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which I think many of our viewers are familiar with." (said at 0:14:56)
No published record matching the claim that engaging in art enhances the brain's production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was located; this does not prove the claim false. While visual arts and art therapy have been investigated for potential psychological, cognitive, and functional neuroplasticity outcomes, direct empirical evidence demonstrating that art making increases brain or circulating BDNF levels has not been established in peer-reviewed studies.
Marian Diamond's 1960s rodent studies showed an approximate 6% increase in cerebral cortex thickness in enriched environments compared to impoverished environments.
"the work of Marian Diamond uh back in the 1960s where she was actually able to demonstrate, in I think a rodent model, a pretty dramatic increase in the thickness of the cortex by about 6% uh in rodents who lived in an enriched environment uh versus an environment that was pretty pretty dull." (said at 0:25:20)
No published record matching Marian Diamond's 1960s rodent studies showing an approximate 6% increase in cerebral cortex thickness in enriched environments compared to impoverished environments was located; this does not prove the claim false.
Poetry activates sound-processing brain regions independently of semantic word comprehension to a greater degree than prose or fiction.
"They're really more around sound and the way like the difference between how we process sound like rock and stone, right? They're so highly visual and we see something very very different when we're using those that those different words and they resonate in a way that, you know, from a sound perspective, separate from understanding word meaning. And that happens through poetry more than it does through um fiction or creative nonfiction." (said at 0:33:40)
No published record matching the claim that poetry activates sound-processing brain regions independently of semantic word comprehension to a greater degree than fiction or prose was located; this does not prove the claim false.
While neuroimaging studies have examined neural responses to the sound of words (PMID: 29789504) and neural activation differences between reading poetry versus prose (PMID: 26409018, PMID: 30186210), none of these studies demonstrate that poetry specifically activates sound-processing auditory regions independently of semantic word meaning to a greater extent than fiction or prose.
Unverified means no publication matching the claim was located; it does not prove the claim false. Spotted an error? See the corrections policy - disputes from the people quoted are prioritized.