Anthony Kaldellis

Anthony Kaldellis is a historian specializing in the Roman Empire. He is the author of "The New Roman Empire," which provides a comprehensive history of the Byzantine Empire (Eastern Roman Empire).

68 claims checked on air: 2 context 1 contradicted 1 overstated 46 supported 18 unverified 2 flagged

What they said on air - context

1:32:36needs contextmoderateThe Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empi

More surviving statues and busts exist from the Roman Empire depicting Hadrian's lover Antinous than of almost anyone else from antiquity except Hadrian himself.

"We have like more statues and busts of Antinous from all of these temples all over the empire than I think of anyone else except Hadrian." (said at 1:32:36)

The speaker's assertion highlights the extraordinary abundance of surviving portraits of Antinous across the Roman Empire, but omits the emperor Augustus. In classical archaeology and Roman sculpture scholarship (e.g., standard corpora by Clairmont and Meyer), Antinous is recognized as having one of the highest numbers of surviving sculptured portraits from antiquity (over 100 extant statues, busts, and reliefs), ranking third overall behind Augustus and Hadrian. While the claim correctly conveys that Antinous outnumbers almost every Roman emperor and historical figure in surviving sculpted portraits, Augustus also surpasses Antinous.

1:53:10needs contextvery lowThe Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empi

Ancient cities suffered continuous negative natural population growth due to disease density, losing approximately 1% to 3% of their population annually.

"ancient cities we now know or suspect are what some historians call death traps. In other words, the density of disease is such that ancient cities probably are losing something like 1 to possibly 3% of their population per year. So just in order to stay with a stable population, they have to import people." (said at 1:53:10)

The speaker describes the 'urban graveyard' (or 'urban penalty') hypothesis widely discussed in historical demography and ancient history (notably applied to ancient Rome and pre-industrial cities by demographic historians such as Walter Scheidel and Keith Hopkins). This hypothesis posits that due to high pathogen density, poor sanitation, and crowded living conditions, urban deaths exceeded births (negative natural increase), requiring continuous immigration from rural areas to sustain city populations. Bioarchaeological studies in Roman Italy confirm higher physiological stress and earlier mortality in urban versus rural populations. However, the specific estimate of a continuous 1% to 3% annual net population loss is a theoretical demographic modeling parameter rather than an empirically documented rate across all ancient cities, and remains an active subject of debate among ancient demographers.

Fact-checked episodes

Publications

No PubMed publication profile has been built for this speaker yet.