Nolan Williams

Stanford Brain Stimulation Lab

Nolan Williams is a neuropsychiatrist and the Director of the Stanford Brain Stimulation Lab. His published research focuses on neuromodulation interventions, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) for disorders such as treatment-resistant depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Additionally, he studies the neural correlates and therapeutic outcomes of magnesium-ibogaine treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.

32 claims checked on air: 2 context 3 overstated 23 supported 4 unverified

What they said on air - context

5 citing their own research

0:19:58needs contextmoderateOne Dose That Heals Addiction, PTSD, and Brain Injury | The

Ibogaine causes QT interval prolongation for a short period of time.

"But, you know, it it prolongs the QT quite a bit for a very short period of time." (said at 0:19:58)

The claim is partially accurate but requires qualification. Ibogaine consistently causes clinically significant QT/QTc interval prolongation (often exceeding 500 ms, with average increases near 95 ms) by blocking hERG potassium channels. However, describing this prolongation as occurring for a "very short period of time" is misleading: while the parent drug's peak effect occurs acutely, QTc prolongation frequently persists beyond 24 hours and can last for several days due to slow clearance and the formation of its active metabolite, noribogaine.

0:41:41needs contexthighOne Dose That Heals Addiction, PTSD, and Brain Injury | The

A New England Journal of Medicine study comparing knee surgery to a sham incision procedure found no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups.

"So like, I know you probably have seen this New England Journal of Medicine uh total knee replacement study where they they did a total they either did an incision and did nothing or did a total knee, and the um total knee patients in the in with kind of the fake surgery incision folks had no difference in outcomes." (said at 0:41:41)

A landmark randomized, placebo-controlled trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine (Moseley et al., 2002) compared arthroscopic knee surgery (lavage or débridement) to a sham procedure (skin incisions and simulated surgery) in 180 patients with knee osteoarthritis, finding no significant differences in pain or functional outcomes between the surgical and sham groups at any point during 24 months of follow-up. A subsequent NEJM trial (Sihvonen et al., 2013) found similar results comparing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy to sham surgery. However, the speaker incorrectly described the procedure as a total knee replacement (arthroplasty); the trials evaluated arthroscopic procedures, not total joint replacements.

Fact-checked episodes

Publications