Richard Horowitz
Richard Horowitz is a physician specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease, tick-borne coinfections, and chronic illness. His published research primarily focuses on treatment protocols for chronic Lyme disease and post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome, particularly evaluated through dapsone combination therapy regimens and the Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome (MSIDS) model. Additionally, his work includes studies on diagnostic assays for babesiosis and clinical reports on therapies for COVID-19.
47 claims checked on air: 5 context 1 contradicted 8 overstated 19 supported 14 unverified
What they said on air - citing their own research
6 citing their own research
Richard Horowitz published the first article in world medical literature on glutathione's efficacy in COVID-19 in April 2020.
"I wrote the first article in the world literature in COVID-19 in April 2020 on glutathione and how it helps with COVID." (said at 0:24:10)
Richard I. Horowitz and colleagues published a two-patient case report titled 'Efficacy of glutathione therapy in relieving dyspnea associated with COVID-19 pneumonia: A report of 2 cases' in Respiratory Medicine Case Reports in April 2020. This was the first published article in the medical literature evaluating clinical treatment with oral and intravenous glutathione in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, because this publication is an uncontrolled case report of only two patients, it provides very low certainty clinical evidence regarding the true therapeutic efficacy of glutathione in COVID-19.
Dapsone exhibits antimalarial activity and is effective against approximately 25% of Babesia cases.
"It has antimalarial properties; it hits, not great, but about 25% of the Babesia cases." (said at 0:34:45)
While dapsone has established antimalarial activity (historically used in antifolate combination therapies such as Lapdap and Maloprim), no clinical trials or published evidence establish that dapsone monotherapy or protocols achieve efficacy in approximately 25% of Babesia cases. Standard first-line treatments for human babesiosis remain atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine; in observational reports of dapsone combination regimens used for chronic tick-borne illness, Babesia coinfections typically require separate antimalarial regimens.
A 9-week dapsone antibiotic protocol induces remission in approximately half of patients with chronic Lyme disease who do not have active Babesia, Bartonella, or mold illness.
"if you have Lyme without active Babesia, Bartonella, without mold, this protocol will put about half of the people in remission from nine weeks of antibiotics." (said at 0:35:15)
Published retrospective chart reviews from the clinician's practice report similar figures: in a retrospective series of 40 patients treated with 7–8 weeks of double-dose dapsone combination therapy (DDDCT), 45% (18/40) remained in remission for 1 year or longer. In a subsequent review of 25 patients receiving 8 weeks of DDDCT followed by a 5–7 day high-dose pulse (~9 weeks total), 30.5% (7/23 evaluable) achieved remission at 3–9 months and 13% (3/23) at 1.5 months (~43.5% total). However, presenting these findings as a definitive clinical rule ("will put about half of the people in remission") overstates the evidence, which consists entirely of small, unblinded, uncontrolled retrospective chart reviews and case series from a single practice without randomized controls.
A culture study conducted with Eva Sapi demonstrated that combining dapsone with doxycycline, rifampin, and azithromycin progressively reduced Borrelia biofilm persister cells.
"So, we found, and I did a study with Eva Sapi from the University of New Haven in culture... every time we added a drug, like when we added doxycycline to dapsone, it lowered the biofilm persisters; we added rifampin to doxy and dapsone, it lowered the biofilm even more. We added Zithromax." (said at 0:35:39)
A 2020 in vitro study co-authored by Richard Horowitz and Eva Sapi evaluated dapsone alone and in combination with doxycycline, rifampin, and azithromycin against Borrelia burgdorferi biofilm forms. The culture study showed that combining dapsone with these intracellular antibiotics significantly decreased biofilm mass, viability, and protective glycosaminoglycan content compared to monotherapies. Because these findings are derived exclusively from in vitro cell culture models, certainty regarding clinical translation to human Lyme disease remains very low.
The Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome (MSIDS) questionnaire was validated in a study of 1,600 people.
"And the Horowitz MSIDS questionnaire, which is on my website, cangetbetter.com, if you take this questionnaire, it will give you a probability of tick-borne, but also you bring it to your doctor. There's 38 items on there... The beauty of the questionnaire is we validated it in 1,600 people." (said at 0:54:56)
A 2017 validation study by Horowitz and Freeman published in the International Journal of General Medicine evaluated the construct, convergent, and discriminant validity of the Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome Questionnaire (HMQ). The publication reported empirical evaluation across cohorts totaling over 1,500–1,600 participants (including Study 1 with 537 patients and Study 2 with 999 participants, alongside a third comparison cohort), finding acceptable internal reliability and ability to distinguish self-reported or confirmed Lyme disease patients from healthy controls.
- supports: Empirical validation of the Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome Questio… (International journal of general medicine 2017) · cited 38x in the literature
"Three studies evaluated such a screening tool, namely the Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome (MSIDS) Questionnaire. The purpose was to see if the questionnaire could accurately distinguish between Lyme patients and healthy individuals. Study 1 examined the construct validity of the scale examining its factor structure and reliability of the questionnaire among 537 individuals being treated for Lyme disease. Study 2 involved an online sample of 999 participants, who self-identified as either healthy (N=217) or suffering from Lyme now (N=782) who completed the Horowitz MSIDS Questionnaire (HMQ) along with an outdoor activity survey." (abstract, methods, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
In a study of 375 patients, dapsone combination therapy statistically improved patients' memory as its primary effect.
"But here's the beauty is dapsone combination therapy, the number one effect it always had was improving people's memory statistically in these 375 patients." (said at 1:13:40)
No published record matching a study of 375 patients evaluating dapsone combination therapy with statistically improved memory as its primary effect was located; this does not prove the claim false. Published retrospective chart reviews and observational cohorts on dapsone combination therapy in chronic Lyme disease/post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome report cohorts of 200 patients (evaluating eight general symptom categories without isolating memory as a primary endpoint), 40 patients, and 25 patients, rather than 375 patients.
Fact-checked episodes
Publications
- Combining Double-Dose and High-Dose Pulsed Dapsone Combination Therapy for Chronic Lyme Disease/Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome and Co-Infections, Including Bartonella: A Report of 3 Cases and a Literature Review.Microorganisms 2024 · CEBM Level 4
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Longer versus Shorter Pulsed High Dose Dapsone Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lyme Disease/Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome with Bartonellosis and Associated Coinfections.Microorganisms 2023 · CEBM Level 4
- Efficacy of Short-Term High Dose Pulsed Dapsone Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lyme Disease/Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) and Associated Co-Infections: A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) 2022 · CEBM Level 4
- Efficacy of glutathione therapy in relieving dyspnea associated with COVID-19 pneumonia: A report of 2 cases.Respiratory medicine case reports 2020 · CEBM Level 4
- A Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Test for Diagnosing Babesiosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2020 · CEBM Level 4
- Three novel prevention, diagnostic, and treatment options for COVID-19 urgently necessitating controlled randomized trials.Medical hypotheses 2020 · CEBM Level 5
- Effect of dapsone alone and in combination with intracellular antibiotics against the biofilm form of B. burgdorferi.BMC research notes 2020 · CEBM Level 5
- Combined Immunofluorescence (IFA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Assays for Diagnosing Babesiosis in Patients from the USA, Europe and Australia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2020 · CEBM Level 4
- Efficacy of Double-Dose Dapsone Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Lyme Disease/Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) and Associated Co-infections: A Report of Three Cases and Retrospective Chart Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) 2020 · CEBM Level 4
- Precision medicine: retrospective chart review and data analysis of 200 patients on dapsone combination therapy for chronic Lyme disease/post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome: part 1.International journal of general medicine 2019 · CEBM Level 4
- Improvement of common variable immunodeficiency using embryonic stem cell therapy in a patient with lyme disease: a clinical case report.Clinical case reports 2018 · CEBM Level 4
- Precision Medicine: The Role of the MSIDS Model in Defining, Diagnosing, and Treating Chronic Lyme Disease/Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome and Other Chronic Illness: Part 2.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2018 · CEBM Level 4
- Empirical validation of the Horowitz Multiple Systemic Infectious Disease Syndrome Questionnaire for suspected Lyme disease.International journal of general medicine 2017 · CEBM Level 4
- Approach to diagnosing Lyme disease misses a large proportion of cases.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2016 · CEBM Level 5
- Rash decisions about southern tick-associated rash illness and Lyme disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2006 · CEBM Level 5
- Coinfection with Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti: bad or worse?The Journal of infectious diseases 2006 · CEBM Level 5
- Lyme disease testing.The Lancet. Infectious diseases 2006 · CEBM Level 5
- Possible role of tick-borne infection in "cat-scratch disease": comment on the article by Giladi et al.Arthritis and rheumatism 2006 · CEBM Level 5
- Lyme disease: scratching the surface.Lancet (London, England) 2005 · CEBM Level 5
- Evidence-based guidelines for the management of Lyme disease.Expert review of anti-infective therapy 2004 · CEBM Level 5