Brad Schoenfeld
Lehman College
Brad Schoenfeld is a professor at Lehman College whose work focuses on exercise science and sports nutrition. His research primarily investigates muscle hypertrophy, body composition, and neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training protocols. His published studies also examine sports nutrition, muscle protein synthesis, and physical fitness metrics.
64 claims checked on air: 3 context 3 contradicted 1 overstated 51 supported 6 unverified
What they said on air - supported
7 citing their own research
When losing weight without resistance training, 25% to 30% of the lost weight comes from muscle mass.
"Evidence shows 25% to 30% of the weight loss will come from muscle if you don't do resistance training." (said at 0:00:00)
Published body-composition research consistently demonstrates that during diet-induced weight loss without exercise, fat-free mass or lean soft tissue accounts for approximately 25% to 33% of the total weight lost (e.g., ~25% in women and ~33% in men). Meta-analyses of randomized trials confirm that adding resistance training significantly preserves fat-free mass and skeletal muscle mass compared to diet-only interventions.
- supports: Critical analysis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-measured body composition changes wi… (Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 2025) · cited 5x in the literature
"The proportion of weight loss as LST was significantly (p < 0.001) larger in male (mean [SD], 0.33 [0.11] kg) than female individuals (0.25 [0.11] kg)" (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effect of resistance exercise on body composition, muscle strength and cardiometabolic hea… (BMJ open sport & exercise medicine 2025) · cited 20x in the literature
"resistance exercise protected against the loss of fat-free mass (between-group standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.40, p=0.0003, moderate certainty) and increased loss of fat mass (SMD: -0.36, p<0.00001, high certainty)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effects of Calorie Restriction With and Without Strength, Endurance or Mixed Training on F… (Diabetes, obesity & metabolism 2026)
"A random-effects model showed a significant effect of EX on FFM, with a pooled mean difference favouring CR combined with EX over CR alone (mean difference (MD) = +0.87 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI): +0.59, +1.16 kg; p ≤ 0.001). On average, EX prevented nearly half of FFM loss (45.7%)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Resistance training produces similar amounts of muscle hypertrophy across a wide loading spectrum, including up to 30 to 40 repetitions per set.
"The literature has now compellingly shown—there's so much literature on the topic, our lab has done quite a bit of research as well as many others, and it shows that you can gain muscle, similar amounts of muscle regardless of the loading across a wide range of loading spectrums up to 30 to even 40 repetitions" (said at 0:00:31)
A substantial body of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrates that resistance training across a wide loading spectrum—ranging from heavy loads (e.g., >80% 1RM or 6–8 repetitions) to low loads (e.g., 30–50% 1RM or 25–35+ repetitions per set)—produces comparable muscle hypertrophy, provided sets are performed with high effort or to momentary muscular failure. While heavier loads remain superior for maximal strength (1RM) gains, hypertrophic adaptations do not significantly differ across these repetition ranges.
- supports: Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in We… (Journal of strength and conditioning research 2015) · cited 417x in the literature
"Both HL and LL conditions produced significant increases in thickness of the elbow flexors (5.3 vs. 8.6%, respectively), elbow extensors (6.0 vs. 5.2%, respectively), and quadriceps femoris (9.3 vs. 9.5%, respectively), with no significant differences noted between groups." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Sys… (Journal of strength and conditioning research 2017) · cited 850x in the literature
"Changes in measures of muscle hypertrophy were similar between conditions. The findings indicate that maximal strength benefits are obtained from the use of heavy loads while muscle hypertrophy can be equally achieved across a spectrum of loading ranges." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains after resistance training with different volume-matc… (Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme 2022) · cited 116x in the literature
"A pooled analysis of the standardized mean difference for hypertrophy outcomes across all studies showed no differences between training loads. Our findings indicate that when the volume load is equal between conditions, the highest loads induce superior dynamic strength gains. Alternatively, hypertrophic adaptations were similar irrespective of the load magnitude." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Estrogen is osteoprotective, so postmenopausal decreases in estrogen increase bone resorption and osteoporosis risk.
"estrogen is osteoprotective. So when women undergo menopause, postmenopausally they're going to have increased bone resorption, which is going to increase their chances of getting osteoporosis." (said at 0:04:08)
Estrogen is well-established as osteoprotective. In bone biology, estrogen suppresses osteoclast formation and activity by regulating key cytokines such as receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG). Following menopause, estrogen deficiency leads to an accelerated increase in bone resorption that outpaces bone formation, resulting in net bone loss and increased risk of osteoporosis.
Non-weight-bearing exercises such as cycling, swimming, and elliptical training do not produce substantial osteogenic effects on bone mineral density compared to weight-bearing exercise.
"If you're doing cycling or even the elliptical machine, it's really not weight-bearing enough to have substantial effects on bone development, and swimming another endeavor." (said at 0:05:10)
Non-weight-bearing and low-impact activities such as swimming and cycling do not provide sufficient skeletal loading or ground reaction forces to stimulate substantial osteogenic adaptations compared to weight-bearing or high-impact activities. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses consistently find that swimmers and cyclists have bone mineral density (BMD) values comparable to sedentary or non-athletic controls, and significantly lower BMD compared to athletes who participate in high-impact and weight-bearing sports.
- supports: Bone health in endurance athletes: runners, cyclists, and swimmers. (Current sports medicine reports 2012) · cited 165x in the literature
"Adolescents and adults who participate in endurance sports, such as running, and non-weight-bearing sports, such as biking and swimming, often have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than athletes participating in ball and power sports, and sometimes their BMD is lower than their inactive peers." (abstract, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: The Effect of Swimming During Childhood and Adolescence on Bone Mineral Density: A Systema… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2016) · cited 92x in the literature
"While swimming is associated with several health benefits, it does not appear to be an effective sport for improving BMD. Swimmers might be in need of additional osteogenic exercises for increasing BMD values." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Swimming and peak bone mineral density: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Journal of sports sciences 2018) · cited 36x in the literature
"Young adult swimmers present similar BMD values than CG and lower values than HIGH." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
A meta-analysis on individuals aged 70 and older showed significant improvements in muscle strength and muscle hypertrophy within 8- to 12-week resistance training programs in novice trainees.
"We carried out a meta-analysis on the oldest of old, which was 70 and above. Although 70 is actually not that—the new 50 now is 70, but 70-plus years old and up to octogenarians, nonagenarians: profound improvements in muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy within 8 to 12-week training programs. These are novice trainees who've never done anything before." (said at 0:09:47)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating resistance training in very elderly adults (mean age ≥75 years, including subgroups aged 80 and older) demonstrated significant improvements in both muscle strength and whole-muscle hypertrophy compared to controls.
There is no scientific evidence that resistance training in children stunts growth or damages epiphyseal plates.
"there's really compelling research now that resistance training in youth not only is not detrimental—so I mean, it does not—I want to dispel the myth now that it stunts growth. I mean, there's been this myth around forever that if you do resistance training early on, it will stunt your growth. There's zero evidence." (said at 0:13:24)
Extensive literature and expert consensus statements from major sports medicine and pediatric exercise organizations show that appropriately designed and supervised youth resistance training does not stunt growth, damage epiphyseal (growth) plates, or negatively impact final adult stature. The belief that lifting weights stunts growth originated from outdated reports of injuries from unsupervised, improper training or industrial labor, but prospective studies and systematic reviews consistently demonstrate that properly supervised resistance training is safe, supports bone mineral density, and does not impair linear growth.
The elevation of growth hormone resulting from resistance training is specific to approximately one hour post-workout.
"And the effects on growth hormone with resistance training are very specific to the one hour or so after the workout." (said at 0:14:24)
The statement is supported by clinical trial and systematic review evidence. Acute resistance exercise induces a transient spike in circulating growth hormone that typically peaks immediately to 30 minutes post-workout and returns to resting baseline levels within approximately 60 minutes.
Body composition assessment methods like DXA, underwater weighing, and bioelectrical impedance analysis measure fat-free mass as a combination of muscle and water rather than isolated muscle mass.
"When I do think it's important to understand like certain measures, underwater weighing—like a lot of the measures that you'll see, DXA, underwater weighing, BIA (bioelectrical impedance analysis), they are looking at not necessarily muscle mass, although there are ways to try to derive that. But when they talk about fat-free mass and lean mass, generally depending on the measure, they're combinations of at the very least muscle and water." (said at 0:17:26)
Standard body composition assessment techniques such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), hydrodensitometry (underwater weighing), and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) evaluate fat-free mass (FFM) or lean soft tissue, which consists of total body water, skeletal muscle, organ tissue, and bone mineral content rather than isolated muscle mass. Skeletal muscle itself is composed mostly of water (approximately 75%), and total body water makes up the largest proportion of fat-free mass across standard multi-compartment body composition models.
- supports: Assessment methods in human body composition. (Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care 2008) · cited 693x in the literature
"Collectively, these techniques allow for the measurement of fat, fat-free mass, bone mineral content, total body water, extracellular water, total adipose tissue and its subdepots (visceral, subcutaneous, and intermuscular), skeletal muscle, select organs, and ectopic fat depots." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Current body composition measurement techniques. (Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity 2017) · cited 279x in the literature
"Available techniques allow for the measurement of fat, fat-free mass, bone mineral content, total body water, extracellular water, total adipose tissue and its subdepots (visceral, subcutaneous, and intermuscular), skeletal muscle, select organs, and ectopic fat depots." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
An hour of hard cardiovascular running exercise burns approximately 500 to 600 calories.
"So for instance, if you do an hour of cardiovascular exercise and hard, you know, where you're running for the most part, I mean you can burn 500, 600 calories in that hour." (said at 0:18:27)
Standardized energy expenditure reference data, such as the Adult Compendium of Physical Activities, quantify physical activity intensities in metabolic equivalents (METs), where 1 MET represents an energy expenditure rate of approximately 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. Running activities range from ~6 METs for light jogging up to 12–15+ METs for higher speeds and vigorous efforts. For an average-weight adult (60–70 kg), 1 hour of moderate-to-hard running corresponds directly to a caloric burn of roughly 500 to 700+ kcal, directly supporting the stated estimate.
Dietary protein needs increase in a caloric deficit compared to maintenance or energy surplus to preserve muscle mass.
"and there's actually evidence that you need more protein than what has been shown for people at maintenance or above to maintain muscle or even to gain it slightly when you're in a caloric deficit. So that actually increases protein needs to some extent." (said at 0:23:34)
A substantial body of randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and position stands confirms that dietary protein requirements increase during a caloric deficit compared to maintenance or energy surplus to attenuate muscle protein breakdown, preserve lean mass, or permit modest lean mass gains when paired with resistance exercise. In an energy deficit, endogenous amino acids are increasingly oxidized for energy, elevating optimal protein targets from approximately 1.6–2.2 g/kg/day at maintenance to 2.3–3.1 g/kg of fat-free mass per day during hypocaloric conditions.
- supports: A systematic review of dietary protein during caloric restriction in resistance trained le… (International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 2014) · cited 125x in the literature
"Protein needs for energy-restricted resistance-trained athletes are likely 2.3-3.1g/kg of FFM scaled upwards with severity of caloric restriction and leanness." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Higher compared with lower dietary protein during an energy deficit combined with intense … (The American journal of clinical nutrition 2016) · cited 260x in the literature
"Our results showed that, during a marked energy deficit, consumption of a diet containing 2.4 g protein · kg(-1) · d(-1) was more effective than consumption of a diet containing 1.2 g protein · kg(-1) · d(-1) in promoting increases in LBM and losses of fat mass when combined with a high volume of resistance and anaerobic exercise." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition. (Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2017) · cited 302x in the literature
"Higher protein intakes (2.3-3.1 g/kg FFM) may be required to maximize muscle retention in lean, resistance-trained subjects under hypocaloric conditions." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Protein Intake Greater than the RDA Differentially Influences Whole-Body Lean Mass Respons… (Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 2020) · cited 40x in the literature
"In the subgroup analyses, protein intakes greater than the RDA attenuated lean mass loss after ER [0.36 (0.06, 0.67) kg, n = 14], increased lean mass after resistance training (RT) [0.77 (0.23, 1.31) kg, n = 3], but did not differentially affect changes in lean mass [0.08 (-0.59, 0.75) kg, n = 7] under nonstressed conditions (no ER + no RT)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
The RDA for protein intake in sedentary individuals is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day.
"So RDA for sedentary individuals is around 0.8 grams per kilogram per day, per kilogram per day." (said at 0:24:04)
The official Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for daily protein intake established by the Institute of Medicine (National Academies) for healthy, sedentary adults is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day (0.8 g/kg/day). This value represents the minimum daily intake estimated to meet the nutrient requirements of 97–98% of healthy individuals to maintain nitrogen balance and prevent deficiency.
- supports: Optimizing Adult Protein Intake During Catabolic Health Conditions. (Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 2020) · cited 62x in the literature
"Although the RDA for protein of 0.8 g/kg body weight is adequate to avoid obvious inadequacies, multiple studies provide evidence that many adults may benefit from protein quantity, quality, and distribution beyond guidelines currently defined by the RDA." (abstract, background, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Nutritional Interventions: Dietary Protein Needs and Influences on Skeletal Muscle of Olde… (The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 2023) · cited 54x in the literature
"Among medically stable older adults, protein intakes below the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) (0.8 g/kg body weight [BW]/d) exacerbate age-related reductions in muscle size, quality, and function." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Resistance-trained individuals require approximately 1.6 to 1.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, with an upper 95% confidence limit around 2.2 grams per kilogram.
"So the general literature shows somewhere around 1.6 to 1.8 grams per kilogram per day of protein is required for resistance training people, which is about double the RDA... And the upper confidence interval is about 2.2 grams per kilogram." (said at 0:24:04)
A landmark systematic review and meta-analysis of 49 randomized controlled trials with 1,863 participants (Morton et al., 2018) evaluated the impact of dietary protein intake on resistance exercise training-induced gains in fat-free mass. Segmented regression analysis identified a plateau breakpoint at 1.62 g/kg/day beyond which further protein intake did not significantly augment gains in fat-free mass, with the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval reaching 2.20 g/kg/day.
There is no scientific evidence that high protein intakes cause kidney damage or reduce bone density in healthy individuals.
"I mean, there's a lot of myths about kidney damage in healthy individuals—no good evidence that there's any negative effects on renal function, certainly on bone density. These are all unsupported from my reading in the literature." (said at 0:25:07)
The statement that there is no scientific evidence of high protein diets causing kidney damage or reducing bone density in healthy individuals is well-supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A 2018 systematic review of 26 studies in healthy adults found that protein intakes above the RDA (≥20% energy or ≥10% higher than baseline) resulted in physiological GFR adaptations within normal ranges and showed no adverse effects on kidney function (Devries et al., 2018). Furthermore, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dietary protein and bone health—including those from the National Osteoporosis Foundation—found no negative impact on bone mineral density or fracture risk, and instead observed neutral to beneficial effects, such as reduced hip fracture risk and higher lumbar spine BMD with higher protein intakes (Shams-White et al., 2017; Wallace et al., 2017; Precise et al., 2023).
- supports: Dietary protein and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the National O… (The American journal of clinical nutrition 2017) · cited 261x in the literature
"Current evidence shows no adverse effects of higher protein intakes. Although there were positive trends on BMD at most bone sites, only the LS showed moderate evidence to support benefits of higher protein intake." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Dietary Protein Intake above the Current RDA and Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta… (Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2017) · cited 120x in the literature
"Data from studies included in these analyses collectively lean toward the hypothesis that protein intake above the current RDA is beneficial to BMD at several sites. This systematic review supports that protein intakes above the current RDA may have some beneficial role in preventing hip fractures and BMD loss." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: A Systematic Review of Renal Health in Healthy Individuals Associated with Protein Intake … (Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 2018) · cited 52x in the literature
"All included studies were of moderate to high risk of bias and, with the exception of 2 included cohorts, were limited in duration (i.e. <6 mo). Data in the current review are insufficient to determine if increased protein intake from a particular source, i.e., plant or animal, influences kidney health outcomes. These data further indicate that, at least in the short term, higher protein intake within the range of recommended intakes for protein is consistent with normal kidney function in healthy individuals." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
A daily protein intake of 1.2 g/kg impairs muscle gains compared to higher intakes to maximize anabolism, particularly in older individuals with anabolic resistance.
"So 1.2 is better than 0.8, certainly, but I mean there's good literature showing—we've done work on this—that if you want to maximize anabolism—so again, it doesn't mean that you're not going to gain any muscle if you're taking in 1.2, but it will impair the gains that you're going to get, especially when you're talking about older individuals where they're anabolically resistant" (said at 0:30:15)
Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials evaluating daily protein intake during resistance exercise training show that while 1.2 g/kg/day is superior to the RDA (0.8 g/kg/day), it is suboptimal for maximizing muscle mass gains. Systematic reviews and meta-regressions demonstrate that resistance training-induced gains in muscle/fat-free mass scale with daily protein intake up to a plateau of approximately 1.6 g/kg/day (1.62 g/kg/day), beyond which further intake yields no additional gain. Furthermore, meta-analyses confirm that increasing age attenuates muscle protein synthetic and hypertrophic responses to exercise and protein intake (anabolic resistance), reducing the efficiency of protein supplementation in older adults compared to younger populations.
- supports: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplement… (British journal of sports medicine 2018) · cited 1119x in the literature
"The impact of protein supplementation on gains in FFM was reduced with increasing age (-0.01 kg (-0.02,-0.00), p=0.002)" (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function … (Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 2022) · cited 265x in the literature
"The evidence suggests that increasing daily protein ingestion may enhance gains in LBM in studies enrolling subjects in RE (SMD [standardized mean difference] = 0.22, 95% CI [95% confidence interval] 0.14:0.30, P < 0.01, 62 studies, moderate level of evidence)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
The per-dose leucine threshold required to trigger muscle protein synthesis increases from 2 grams to 3 grams as individuals get older.
"I've seen the 3 grams, where it starts to increase from 2 to 3 grams of leucine as you get older." (said at 0:32:54)
Published literature on the 'leucine trigger' hypothesis and age-related anabolic resistance demonstrates that aging decreases skeletal muscle sensitivity to amino acid stimulation. While younger adults typically reach the threshold for maximal muscle protein synthesis (MPS) stimulation with approximately 1.5 to 2 grams of leucine (roughly 20 grams of high-quality protein), older adults require a higher threshold of around 3 grams (or more) of leucine per meal to adequately stimulate mTORC1 signaling and post-prandial MPS.
- supports: Defining meal requirements for protein to optimize metabolic roles of amino acids. (The American journal of clinical nutrition 2015) · cited 137x in the literature
"The best characterized of these signals is the leucine-induced activation of mTORC1, which leads to the stimulation of skeletal muscle protein synthesis after ingestion of a meal that contains protein. The response of this metabolic pathway to dietary protein (i.e., meal threshold) declines with advancing age or reduced physical activity." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Does the muscle protein synthetic response to exercise and amino acid-based nutrition dimi… (American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism 2016) · cited 123x in the literature
"However, the exercise volume completed and/or the amino acid/protein dose and leucine content must exceed a certain threshold to stimulate equivalent MPS rates in young and older adults, below which age-related muscle anabolic resistance may become apparent." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Evaluating the Leucine Trigger Hypothesis to Explain the Post-prandial Regulation of Muscl… (Frontiers in nutrition 2021) · cited 73x in the literature
"However, our data indicate that the leucine trigger hypothesis confers most application in regulating the post-prandial response of MPS to ingested proteins in older adults." (abstract, conclusion, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
A study from Luc van Loon's lab evaluating protein doses of 0, 15, 30, and 45 grams showed a non-linear dose-response relationship for muscle protein synthesis that continued to increase above 30 grams.
"there's a recent study out of Luc van Loon's lab, who's a terrific researcher, protein researcher in the Netherlands, and they looked at—again, my memory now, it's been a while since I've read this study, but it was—they did 0, 15 grams of protein—I believe they used whey—30 and 45, I think it was. But anyway, it showed a dose-response relationship for muscle protein synthesis where they kept getting a greater response. Now, it did seem to somewhat—the curve wasn't—it wasn't a linear relationship, so there was, you know, more parabolic where it started to trail off after 30 grams, but it did continue on above the 30 grams." (said at 0:33:28)
A double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted by Luc van Loon's group (Holwerda et al., 2019) evaluated post-exercise protein ingestion at doses of 0, 15, 30, and 45 g of milk protein in older men. The study demonstrated that myofibrillar protein synthesis rates increased with protein dose and plateaued around 30 to 45 g (0.0951%/h for 30 g vs. 0.0970%/h for 45 g), while dietary amino acid incorporation into de novo myofibrillar protein and whole-body net protein balance continued to increase dose-dependently up to 45 g. A companion endurance-exercise trial from the same lab using the same doses (Churchward-Venne et al., 2020) similarly found that 30 g maximized myofibrillar protein synthesis rates while amino acid incorporation into mitochondrial protein continued to increase up to 45 g.
- supports: Dose-Dependent Increases in Whole-Body Net Protein Balance and Dietary Protein-Derived Ami… (The Journal of nutrition 2019) · cited 90x in the literature
"Forty-eight healthy older men... were randomly assigned to ingest 0, 15, 30, or 45 g milk protein concentrate after a single bout of resistance exercise... Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were higher after ingesting 30 (0.0951% ± 0.0062%/h, P = 0.07) or 45 g of protein (0.0970% ± 0.0062%/h, P < 0.05) than after 0 g (0.0746% ± 0.0051%/h). Incorporation of dietary protein-derived amino acids (l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine) into de novo myofibrillar protein showed a dose-dependent increase after ingestion of 15, 30, or 45 g protein (0.0171 ± 0.0017, 0.0296 ± 0.0030, and 0.0397 ± 0.0026 mole percentage excess, respectively; P < 0.05)." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Dose-response effects of dietary protein on muscle protein synthesis during recovery from … (The American journal of clinical nutrition 2020) · cited 106x in the literature
"In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design, 48 healthy, young, endurance-trained men... ingested 45 g carbohydrate with either 0 (0 g PRO), 15 (15 g PRO), 30 (30 g PRO), or 45 (45 g PRO) g intrinsically l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine and l-[1-13C]-leucine labeled milk protein after endurance exercise... 30 g PRO stimulated a ∼46% increase in MyoPS rates (%/h) compared with 0 g PRO and was sufficient to maximize MyoPS rates after endurance exercise." (abstract, methods and results)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Longitudinal research indicates that spreading protein intake across at least three or four relatively spaced meals per day leads to better protein utilization.
"and there's been some research, even longitudinal research, that backs this up, that you get better utilization of protein if it's spread out, let's say, at least over three meals relatively spaced, like breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and perhaps even four." (said at 0:37:05)
Published research, including metabolic trials and prospective longitudinal cohort data, supports the claim that distributing protein intake evenly across spaced meals (such as breakfast, lunch, and dinner) promotes better protein utilization and muscle mass retention compared to a skewed distribution pattern. A randomized crossover feeding trial in healthy adults demonstrated that distributing ~30 g of protein evenly across breakfast, lunch, and dinner stimulated 24-hour muscle protein fractional synthesis rates by 25% more than skewing the majority of protein into the evening meal. In addition, longitudinal data from the NuAge cohort (following 712 older adults over two years) found that an even distribution of protein intake across meals was associated with significantly higher lean mass throughout follow-up.
The human body remains highly anabolic for at least 24 hours following a resistance training workout.
"and there's actually been quite a lot of research on this—that the body is highly anabolic for at least 24 hours, if not more, after a workout." (said at 0:38:45)
Extensive clinical trial and physiological tracer research demonstrates that an acute bout of resistance exercise stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and keeps muscle tissue in an elevated anabolic state over an extended time course lasting at least 24 to 48 hours post-exercise. While the exact duration and amplitude of this post-exercise elevation are modulated by training status (tending to be shorter-lived and peaking earlier in trained individuals compared to untrained individuals), heightened 24-hour myofibrillar protein fractional synthesis rates following resistance exercise are well documented.
- supports: Acute resistance exercise augments integrative myofibrillar protein synthesis. (Metabolism: clinical and experimental 2012) · cited 41x in the literature
"In contrast, upon determination of myofibrillar FSR, there was an RE effect (EX, 0.94% ± 0.16% vs CON, 0.75% ± 0.08%; P < .05). High-intensity RE without prior training impacts integrative myofibrillar 24-hour FSR, perhaps without altering total responses." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: A review of resistance training-induced changes in skeletal muscle protein synthesis and t… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2015) · cited 226x in the literature
"Previous studies have shown that the amplitude and duration of increases in MPS after an acute bout of RE are modulated by an individual's training status... Exercise-induced increases in MPS are shorter lived and peak earlier in the trained state than in the untrained state, resulting in a smaller overall muscle protein synthetic response in the trained state." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi)
The post-exercise nutrient timing window for protein intake has only a minor effect on muscle hypertrophy compared to meeting total daily protein intake.
"And even in the paper we published, which people will take, 'There's no anabolic window'—that's not what our research showed, but it showed that it's really minor. The much more important thing is getting your total daily protein intake" (said at 0:40:10)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (Schoenfeld, Aragon, and Krieger, 2013) investigating protein timing found that while simple pooled analyses suggested a small-to-moderate benefit for muscle hypertrophy, the apparent effect of timing disappeared after controlling for covariates. Meta-regression demonstrated that total daily protein intake was the primary predictor of muscle hypertrophy adaptations, supporting the claim that nutrient timing around a workout has a minor effect compared to meeting overall daily protein intake.
Whole-muscle hypertrophy gains are similar across a wide spectrum of repetition ranges, from heavy loads up to 30 to 40 repetitions per set, when sets are performed with high effort.
"The literature has now compellingly shown—there's just so much literature on the topic. Our lab has done quite a bit of research, as well as many others, and it shows that you can gain muscle, similar amounts of muscle, regardless of the loading across a wide range of loading spectrums, up to 30 to even 40 repetitions, which is a long—that's a long set. And that's at the whole-muscle level." (said at 0:46:10)
Extensive meta-analytic evidence from randomized controlled trials supports the claim that whole-muscle hypertrophy is similar across a wide spectrum of loading and repetition ranges (from heavy loads to very light loads involving 30 to 40+ repetitions) when sets are taken to or near momentary muscular failure. While maximal dynamic strength (1RM) gains favor heavier loads, increases in muscle cross-sectional area and thickness do not meaningfully differ between low-load and high-load protocols.
A circa 2012 study by Stuart Phillips showed no difference in whole-muscle hypertrophy between 30% 1RM and 80% 1RM in untrained subjects performing leg extensions.
"Stu Phillips had published a study circa 2012, and he went on social media—it was Facebook at the time—and it was on untrained subjects doing leg extensions, and it showed that there was no difference in whole-muscle hypertrophy between 30% 1RM, which is like 30 reps, versus 80% 1RM, which was like 8 reps." (said at 0:47:04)
A 2012 randomized controlled trial from Stuart Phillips' laboratory (Mitchell et al., 2012) evaluated 18 young men performing unilateral leg extensions for 10 weeks across different load protocols to failure: 30% 1RM (3 sets), 80% 1RM (1 set), and 80% 1RM (3 sets). Whole-muscle volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed significant muscle hypertrophy that did not differ between the volume-matched 30% and 80% 1RM groups (6.8 ± 1.8% vs. 7.2 ± 1.9%, P = 0.18).
Brad Schoenfeld's lab conducted a resistance training study comparing heavy and light loads in resistance-trained subjects and found no difference in muscle hypertrophy.
"And I said, 'I'm going to do this study in trained individuals. You're going to see it was going to be no question—the older individuals are going to need the heavier loads to get those highest-threshold motor units, the type 2 fibers, into play.' And lo and behold, I carried out that study, and no difference. It was really—ate crow." (said at 0:47:35)
A 2015 randomized controlled trial by Schoenfeld and colleagues tested low-load (25–35 repetitions per set) versus high-load (8–12 repetitions per set) resistance training to failure over 8 weeks in 18 resistance-trained young men. The study found significant and comparable increases in muscle thickness of the elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and quadriceps femoris in both groups, with no statistically significant differences in hypertrophy between loading conditions (though high-load training produced superior maximal strength gains).
- supports: Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in We… (Journal of strength and conditioning research 2015) · cited 417x in the literature
"Both HL and LL conditions produced significant increases in thickness of the elbow flexors (5.3 vs. 8.6%, respectively), elbow extensors (6.0 vs. 5.2%, respectively), and quadriceps femoris (9.3 vs. 9.5%, respectively), with no significant differences noted between groups." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Sys… (Journal of strength and conditioning research 2017) · cited 850x in the literature
"Changes in measures of muscle hypertrophy were similar between conditions. The findings indicate that maximal strength benefits are obtained from the use of heavy loads while muscle hypertrophy can be equally achieved across a spectrum of loading ranges." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
In aging and sarcopenia, type 1 muscle fibers are relatively preserved while type 2 muscle fibers experience preferential atrophy and loss through apoptosis.
"As you age, the type 1 fibers are more well preserved, where the type 2 fibers, there's even what's called apoptosis, which has been shown—there's a loss of fibers, but certainly there's a diminishment where the fibers get smaller and smaller. The sarcopenic effect is more specific to the type 2 fibers" (said at 0:52:10)
The speaker's claim is supported by the literature on muscle aging. In sarcopenia and aging, type II (fast-twitch) muscle fibers preferentially undergo atrophy (diminishment in fiber size) and loss compared to type I (slow-twitch) fibers, which are relatively preserved. Furthermore, elevated apoptotic signaling and caspase activation in type II fibers are recognized mechanisms contributing to myocyte loss and muscle fiber atrophy with aging.
- supports: Role of apoptosis in sarcopenia. (The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 2003) · cited 147x in the literature
"By age 80 it is estimated that humans generally lose 30%-40% of skeletal muscle fibers, particularly from muscles containing type II fibers such as the vastus lateralis muscle... Therefore, the activation of these proteolytic caspases may be partly responsible for the initiation of muscle protein degradation, loss of muscle nuclei, which is associated with local atrophy, and finally into cell death of the myocyte." (abstract)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Muscle fiber specific apoptosis and TNF-alpha signaling in sarcopenia are attenuated by li… (FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 2005) · cited 283x in the literature
"In contrast, in the SVL TNF-alpha stimulated apoptotic signaling with age to a much higher extent than was observed in the soleus. Moreover, a reduction in muscle mass, cross-sectional area, and fiber number in the SVL coincided with this age-linked elevation in apoptosis." (abstract, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
A meta-analysis showed that functional improvements in older adults were optimized when resistance training incorporated fast concentric contractions combined with controlled eccentric contractions.
"And our group was involved recently in a meta-analysis on older individuals that showed functional improvements were optimized when they did training that involved moving the concentric action quickly and then doing a controlled eccentric." (said at 0:55:50)
A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis co-authored by the speaker's research group evaluated 20 randomized controlled trials (566 community-living older adults aged ≥60 years) comparing power training (defined as lifting weights as fast as possible during the concentric phase with controlled lowering) against traditional strength training (controlled lifting and lowering). Power training showed a modest, statistically significant advantage for improving objective physical function (standardized mean difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.05–0.54; 13 RCTs, n=383). The certainty of the underlying evidence was rated as low due to risk of bias and imprecision across the included trials.
A meta-analysis shows that taking every resistance training set to failure provides no additional benefit for muscle hypertrophy and shows a small detriment for strength gains compared to stopping short of failure.
"So certainly, you need to train with a high amount of effort, but to take certainly to take every set to failure doesn't show any benefit for hypertrophy. It actually showed a small detriment for strength. So with strength, stopping a couple reps short of failure seemed to have better effects on maximizing strength than training to failure." (said at 1:01:04)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses support the claim. A meta-analysis by Davies et al. (2016) found that non-failure training produced slightly greater strength gains than training to failure (ES = 0.34, p = 0.02; a 0.6–1.3% difference favoring non-failure). Similarly, meta-analyses by Grgic et al. (2022) and Refalo et al. (2023) found that training to momentary muscular failure is not required for muscle hypertrophy and does not produce superior overall hypertrophic adaptations compared to stopping short of failure when volume is accounted for.
- supports: Effect of Training Leading to Repetition Failure on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2016) · cited 190x in the literature
"Non-failure training resulted in a 0.6-1.3% greater strength increase than failure training. A small pooled effect favouring non-failure training was found (ES = 0.34; p = 0.02). Significant small pooled effects on muscular strength were also found for non-failure versus failure training with compound exercises (ES = 0.37-0.38; p = 0.03) and trained participants (ES = 0.37; p = 0.049)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular … (Journal of sport and health science 2022) · cited 208x in the literature
"Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between the training conditions for muscular strength (ES = -0.09, 95%CI: -0.22 to 0.05) and for hypertrophy (ES = 0.22, 95%CI: -0.11 to 0.55). Subgroup analyses that stratified the studies according to body region, exercise selection, or study design showed no significant differences between training conditions. In studies that did not equate training volume between the groups, the analysis showed significant favoring of non-failure training on strength gains (ES = -0.32, 95%CI: -0.57 to -0.07)." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Sy… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2023) · cited 64x in the literature
"Overall, our main findings suggest that (i) there is no evidence to support that resistance training performed to momentary muscular failure is superior to non-failure resistance training for muscle hypertrophy and (ii) higher velocity loss thresholds, and theoretically closer proximities-to-failure do not always elicit greater muscle hypertrophy." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Resistance training volume exhibits a dose-response relationship with muscle hypertrophy up to a certain point.
"So volume has been shown to be a driver of hypertrophy. Again, we've done original research on this, we've done meta-analytic work, and there is a dose-response relationship up to a certain point." (said at 1:07:40)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials confirm that weekly resistance training volume (quantified by total sets per muscle group) exhibits a positive dose-response relationship with muscle hypertrophy. Higher training volumes result in greater gains in muscle mass, though the incremental benefits plateau or reach diminishing returns at higher volume ranges (typically 12 to 20 weekly sets per muscle group, depending on the specific muscle).
The minimal effective dose of resistance training for muscle hypertrophy is roughly four sets per muscle group per week.
"But we recently published a review paper called "No Time to Lift." It's open access, so you can maybe post on this podcast the link to that or show the image of the study. But we basically kind of looked at what is your minimal effective dose, and that was roughly around four sets per week per muscle per week" (said at 1:08:30)
The speaker accurately describes the findings of the 2021 narrative review "No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy" (co-authored by Schoenfeld). The review evaluated the literature on time-efficient resistance training and concluded that performing a minimum of 4 weekly sets per muscle group (using a 6–15 repetition maximum loading range or up to failure) serves as an effective minimal dose for hypertrophy and strength adaptations.
Acute transient systemic hormonal spikes resulting from resistance training have little to no meaningful effect on muscle hypertrophy.
"And that used to be thought to be a main driver of hypertrophy. The compelling body of literature now shows that it probably doesn't have—if it does have an effect, it would be very modest, and it might not even have any effect at all." (said at 1:15:40)
The speaker's statement accurately reflects the scientific consensus regarding the 'hormone hypothesis' of resistance exercise. Multiple randomized within-subject studies and cohort investigations demonstrate that transient systemic elevations in endogenous anabolic hormones (such as growth hormone, testosterone, and IGF-1) following resistance exercise do not drive or correlate significantly with long-term muscle hypertrophy. Instead, muscle hypertrophy is primarily driven by local, intrinsic mechanical tension and intramuscular signaling pathways.
- supports: Elevations in ostensibly anabolic hormones with resistance exercise enhance neither traini… (Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 2010) · cited 290x in the literature
"We conclude that exposure of loaded muscle to acute exercise-induced elevations in endogenous anabolic hormones enhances neither muscle hypertrophy nor strength with resistance training in young men." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Human exercise-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy is an intrinsic process. (The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 2010) · cited 114x in the literature
"However, while these hormones are clearly anabolic during childhood and puberty, or when given at supraphysiological exogenous doses, the transient post-exercise elevations in hormone concentration are of little consequence to the either the acute protein synthetic response or to a hypertrophic phenotype after resistance training." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Associations of exercise-induced hormone profiles and gains in strength and hypertrophy in… (European journal of applied physiology 2012) · cited 152x in the literature
"There were no significant correlations between the exercise-induced elevations (area under the curve-AUC) of GH, fT and IGF-1 and gains in LBM or leg press strength." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Taking short rest periods between sets compromises muscle hypertrophy compared to longer rest periods.
"And that's why it's actually been shown that resting short, having short rest periods between sets—if you're doing a certain number of sets and you're resting short, taking short rest, it actually compromises hypertrophy." (said at 1:16:15)
When the number of sets is fixed, very short inter-set rest periods (e.g., ≤60 seconds) generally lead to lower total volume load due to accumulated fatigue, which compromises muscle hypertrophy compared to longer rest periods (>60–180 seconds). A 2024 systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis found a small hypertrophic advantage for rest intervals longer than 60 seconds compared to short rest periods, though benefits appeared to plateau beyond approximately 90 seconds. A 2016 randomized controlled trial in resistance-trained men similarly demonstrated greater muscle thickness gains with 3-minute versus 1-minute rest intervals when set volume was held constant.
Endogenous growth hormone secretion peaks at night.
"growth hormone is a very interesting hormone because it's pulsatile. So it's secreted—at night is when you're getting your greatest growth hormone release." (said at 1:17:15)
Human physiology studies firmly establish that endogenous growth hormone (GH) secretion is pulsatile and reaches its primary peak during nocturnal sleep, particularly during slow-wave (deep) sleep.
Evidence indicates that women recover more quickly inter-set during resistance training than men, allowing them to rest for shorter periods while maintaining volume load.
"The one area that there seems to be some evidence is that women are able to recover a little more quickly, both inter-set, so they can actually rest somewhat shorter and gain back most of the volume load." (said at 1:18:28)
Evidence supports the claim that women generally demonstrate greater resistance to neuromuscular fatigue and faster inter-set recovery during dynamic resistance exercise compared to men. Studies assessing multi-set resistance exercise protocols demonstrate that women lose less torque/power between sets and can complete higher repetition volumes across sets with short-to-moderate rest intervals. For instance, in controlled bench press and squat protocols, women sustained more repetitions across repeated sets with standardized rest periods due to more rapid inter-set recovery rather than differences in within-set fatigue.
- supports: Relationship between maximal oxygen uptake, within-set fatigue and between-set recovery du… (BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation 2024)
"Regarding recovery between sets, men showed greater relative peak power (P = 0.016) and peak torque (P = 0.034) loss between sets in both exercises, respectively, compared to women. Women also tended to complete more repetitions than men (main effect of sex, P = 0.057)... In contrast, women recover better than men between sets in both exercises." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Biological sex differences in fatigue in resistance-trained individuals: A scoping review. (International journal of sports medicine 2025) · cited 5x in the literature
"some evidence of greater fatigability in males during or immediately following resistance training were found when (1) more complex free-weight exercises were performed with moderate loads, (2) rest periods were shorter, and (3) males were substantially stronger than females in relative terms" (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: The effects of biological sex on fatigue during and recovery from resistance exercise. (PeerJ 2026) · cited 1x in the literature
"The female subjects completed more reps during the fatigue protocol (females: 58.3 ± 27.3; males: 29.6 ± 10.6; p = 0.0001)... Furthermore, the difference in performance during the fatigue protocol appears to be attributable to the female subjects recovering more quickly during the rest intervals, rather than fatiguing more slowly while performing each set." (abstract, results and conclusions)
pubmedfull study (doi)
The muscle protein synthetic response to resistance training lasts for a time course of roughly 48 hours.
"To some extent, it also has to do with the muscle protein synthetic response, which is roughly—the time course is about 48 hours" (said at 1:19:50)
Human metabolic tracer studies demonstrate that a single bout of resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis (MPS) for a duration spanning roughly 24 to 48 hours post-exercise. Rates of MPS rise rapidly within several hours of exercise, peak substantially around 24 hours (often more than double baseline), and gradually return toward baseline levels between 36 and 48 hours.
- supports: Changes in human muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise. (Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 1992) · cited 439x in the literature
"The results indicate that a single bout of heavy resistance exercise can increase biceps MPS for up to 24 h postexercise." (abstract, conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: The time course for elevated muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise. (Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee 1995) · cited 247x in the literature
"It has been shown that muscle protein synthetic rate (MPS) is elevated in humans by 50% at 4 hrs following a bout of heavy resistance training, and by 109% at 24 hrs following training. This study further examined the time course for elevated muscle protein synthesis by examining its rate at 36 hrs following a training session... At an average time of 36 hrs postexercise, MPS in the exercised arm had returned to within 14% of the control arm value, the difference being nonsignificant. It is concluded that following a bout of heavy resistance training, MPS increases rapidly, is more than double at 24 hrs, and thereafter declines rapidly so that at 36 hrs it has almost returned to baseline." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Cold water immersion post-training blunts acute intracellular anabolic signaling, muscle protein synthesis, satellite cell response, and long-term muscle hypertrophy and strength gains.
"Particularly, it's been shown with cold water immersion, there is emerging evidence that it actually has negative effects, particularly on hypertrophy, but on strength measures as well. Somewhat limited evidence, but it's been shown there's triangulation of evidence, meaning that we have acute data that shows it blunts intracellular anabolic signaling, that it blunts muscle protein synthesis, satellite cell—when you talk about anabolic signaling, the pro-inflammatory response, which on one end is why, quote-unquote, it helps with recovery, but the acute pro-inflammatory response actually has been shown to have a positive effect on muscle development... And there's been longitudinal evidence showing that it blunts hypertrophy over longer-term studies." (said at 1:22:10)
Randomized trials and mechanistic studies confirm that cold water immersion (CWI) performed after resistance exercise attenuates acute anabolic signaling (e.g., p70S6K and rps6 phosphorylation), reduces myofibrillar muscle protein synthesis rates, attenuates the satellite cell response (NCAM+ and Pax7+ satellite cell activation), and impairs long-term skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy. While the attenuation of muscle hypertrophy is robustly supported across trials, effects on strength gains are somewhat more variable, aligning with the speaker's qualification that evidence regarding strength measures is slightly more limited.
- supports: Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long-term adap… (The Journal of physiology 2015) · cited 208x in the literature
"NCAM(+) - and Pax7(+) -positive satellite cell numbers were greater after ACT than after CWI (P < 0.05). Phosphorylation of p70S6 kinase(Thr421/Ser424) increased after exercise in both conditions but was greater after ACT (P < 0.05). These data suggest that CWI attenuates the acute changes in satellite cell numbers and activity of kinases that regulate muscle hypertrophy, which may translate to smaller long-term training gains in muscle strength and hypertrophy." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Cold water immersion attenuates anabolic signaling and skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy, … (Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 2019) · cited 59x in the literature
"CWI blunted resistance training-induced muscle fiber hypertrophy, but not maximal strength, potentially via reduced skeletal muscle protein anabolism and increased catabolism." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Postexercise cooling impairs muscle protein synthesis rates in recreational athletes. (The Journal of physiology 2020) · cited 68x in the literature
"Postexercise myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were lower in CWI compared to CON based upon l-[1- 13 C]-leucine (0.058 ± 0.011 vs. 0.072 ± 0.017% h -1 , respectively; P = 0.024) and l-[ring- 2 H 5 ]-phenylalanine (0.042 ± 0.009 vs. 0.053 ± 0.013% h -1 , respectively; P = 0.025)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Research indicates that older adults require a higher minimum volume of resistance training to maintain muscle mass compared to younger individuals.
"interestingly, it seems their maintenance needs to be somewhat higher for volume, so they can't use as high volumes, but also they need to have kind of a higher minimum volume to maintain their mass. There's limited evidence of that, but there was one study in particular that seemed to indicate that." (said at 1:22:33)
A landmark randomized trial by Bickel et al. (2011) evaluated resistance training maintenance dosing in younger (20–35 years) and older (60–75 years) adults following a 16-week training period. The study found that while younger adults maintained their muscle mass and myofiber hypertrophy when exercise volume was reduced to one-third or one-ninth of the original dose, older adults failed to maintain muscle hypertrophy at these reduced doses, concluding that older adults require a higher minimum weekly loading dose to preserve muscle mass adaptations.
Exercise-induced muscle soreness is primarily caused by the eccentric component of exercise.
"Soreness generally is due to a novel response or a novel stimuli, and usually that's—it's primarily due to the eccentric component of exercise." (said at 1:31:58)
The claim that exercise-induced muscle soreness (delayed-onset muscle soreness, or DOMS) is primarily caused by novel exercise stimuli and particularly the eccentric component of exercise is supported by extensive physiological literature. Reviews examining the pathophysiology of DOMS demonstrate that unaccustomed or novel physical activity and eccentric muscle contractions (where muscles lengthen under tension) cause microtrauma to muscle tissue and are the primary drivers of exercise-induced muscle soreness (PMID: 12617692, PMID: 3521903, PMID: 42390527).
Downhill running is an eccentric form of aerobic training.
"And that, by the way, can also be done through, let's say, downhill running; it would be an eccentric form of aerobic training." (said at 1:31:58)
Downhill running is well established in exercise physiology and biomechanics as an endurance/aerobic exercise modality characterized predominantly by eccentric (lengthening under tension) muscle contractions, particularly of the knee extensors during ground impact and deceleration.
Concentric exercise can cause muscle soreness and muscle damage.
"Well, even concentric exercise can cause soreness, and there's muscle damage that occurs" (said at 1:32:18)
While eccentric (lengthening) contractions are well-known to cause substantially greater degrees of mechanical strain, delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), and structural disruption, evidence shows that unaccustomed concentric (shortening) exercise—especially when performed at long muscle lengths or high volumes—can also induce measurable muscle soreness and indices of muscle damage.
Muscle soreness is linked to damage in the epimysium or extracellular matrix, involving nociceptors exposed to free nerve endings and free radicals.
"it seems to be also more specific to muscle damage and even damage within the epimysium or extracellular matrix. Again, these aren't necessarily clear, so connective tissue might be even more relevant. It's speculative that that might have greater relevance to soreness, with nociceptors that are exposed to free nerve endings and there's interaction with free radicals." (said at 1:32:31)
The speaker accurately describes an emerging scientific hypothesis regarding delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) while explicitly framing it as speculative. Emerging anatomical and histological evidence indicates that post-exercise soreness may originate from microtrauma and inflammation within the muscle-associated connective tissue (such as the epimysium, fascia, and extracellular matrix), which has a high density of nociceptive free nerve endings that become sensitized by mechanical damage, reactive oxygen species (free radicals), and inflammatory mediators.
Muscle soreness is not necessary to achieve muscle hypertrophy.
"Do you need to be sore to make gains? No, I think that's pretty clear." (said at 1:33:01)
Literature reviewing exercise-induced muscle damage and delayed onset muscle soreness indicates that muscle damage and soreness are not mandatory prerequisites for skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Studies demonstrate that hypertrophy can occur in the relative absence of significant muscle damage.
The repeated bout effect causes the body to adapt and experience progressively less muscle soreness when repeating the same exercise over time.
"There does seem to be a repeated bout effect, where as you keep doing the same thing over and over again, the body adapts and gets less and less sore over time." (said at 1:33:32)
The repeated bout effect is a well-established physiological phenomenon in exercise science. An initial bout of exercise (particularly involving eccentric muscle contractions) induces neuromuscular, cellular, and mechanical adaptations that significantly attenuate markers of muscle damage—including delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), loss of strength, and serum creatine kinase elevation—when identical exercise is repeated.
Eccentric and concentric exercises have different intracellular signaling cascades, implying a synergism for muscle hypertrophy.
"there seems to be a synergism between eccentric and concentric exercise, where the intracellular signaling cascade for eccentric exercise is somewhat different than that of concentric, and that would imply a synergism in terms of the hypertrophic response." (said at 1:34:32)
Evidence supports the speaker's claim that eccentric and concentric contractions elicit distinct molecular signaling pathways and architectural adaptations. Concentric contractions predominantly stimulate cross-sectional sarcomere additions in parallel, whereas eccentric contractions uniquely induce mechanical strain-related signaling cascades, distinct myogenic responses, and sarcomere additions in series (fascicle lengthening). Because lengthening and shortening contractions stimulate divergent structural and intracellular remodeling mechanisms, combining both contraction types is understood to provide a complementary, synergistic hypertrophic stimulus.
Muscles develop regionally, with eccentric exercise promoting growth more in the distal portion and concentric exercise promoting growth more in the mid-portion.
"There's also evidence that muscles develop regionally, so it's this interesting research that, like, certain parts of muscles will develop more than others. And eccentric exercise seems to work more in the distal portion of the muscle, whereas concentric seems to work more in the mid-portion of the muscle, and thus combining them, again, would be beneficial." (said at 1:35:03)
Human intervention studies examining contraction-specific muscle adaptations have demonstrated regional differences in muscle hypertrophy. Specifically, research evaluating the vastus lateralis found that eccentric resistance training led to preferential hypertrophy in the distal region of the muscle, whereas concentric training produced greater increases in muscle cross-sectional area and pennation angle in the muscle mid-belly.
Warm water baths help alleviate muscle soreness.
"warm water baths seem to again help to alleviate soreness." (said at 1:36:03)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials indicate that heat therapies, including warm or hot water immersion and superficial heat applications, can help alleviate delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) after strenuous exercise. Meta-analytic evidence shows significant reductions in muscle pain within 24 hours and beyond 24 hours post-exercise compared with passive recovery, although the magnitude of pain relief can vary by modality (e.g., hot packs vs. immersion baths) and timing of application.
- supports: Heat and cold therapy reduce pain in patients with delayed onset muscle soreness: A system… (Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine 2021) · cited 60x in the literature
"Heat treatment could reduce the pain of patients. It had obvious effects on the pain within 24 h (SMD -1.17, 95%CI -2.62 to -0.09, P = 0.03) and over 24 h (SMD -0.82, 95%CI -1.38 to -0.26, P = 0.004)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effect of cold and heat therapies on pain relief in patients with delayed onset muscle sor… (Journal of rehabilitation medicine 2022) · cited 38x in the literature
"A total of 59 studies involving 1,367 patients were eligible for this study. Ten interventions were examined: contrast water therapy, phase change material, the novel modality of cryotherapy, cold-water immersion, hot/warm-water immersion, cold pack, hot pack, ice massage, ultrasound, and passive recovery." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
The chronic interference hypothesis was based on animal and rodent models showing cardiovascular exercise upregulates AMPK, which blunts the anabolic mTOR pathway.
"There was something called the chronic interference hypothesis, which basically was—it was actually shown in animal models and rodent models, where the intracellular signaling for cardiovascular exercise upregulated your catabolic pathways, your AMPK pathway—again, I don't want to get too technical here, but AMPK is a catabolic pathway which actually blunts the mTOR pathway, which is an anabolic pathway." (said at 1:37:36)
The speaker accurately describes the molecular basis of the concurrent training interference hypothesis. Foundational rodent models (such as Atherton et al., 2005) demonstrated an 'AMPK-PKB/mTOR switch,' showing that endurance-like muscle stimulation selectively activates 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and deactivates translational signaling, whereas resistance-like stimulation activates the PKB-TSC2-mTOR pathway to stimulate protein synthesis. Reviews and subsequent human trials explicitly note that the hypothesis that endurance exercise-induced AMPK activation blunts mTORC1 signaling originated primarily from rodent muscle experiments.
Meta-analytic data demonstrates that within reasonable training volumes, concurrent aerobic and resistance training does not blunt the anabolic hypertrophic effect, even when performed on the same day.
"we have some pretty good meta-analytic data now showing that within, you know, decent volumes of training, there does not seem to be a blunting of the anabolic effect, and that's even when it's performed in the same day." (said at 1:38:36)
Comprehensive meta-analyses demonstrate that concurrent aerobic and resistance training does not significantly blunt whole-muscle hypertrophy compared to resistance training alone. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 studies (Schumann et al., 2022) found no significant difference in muscle hypertrophy between concurrent training and isolated strength training (standardized mean difference: -0.01; 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.18). Furthermore, meta-analytic data evaluating intra-session exercise sequence and same-day concurrent training show that muscle hypertrophy adaptations remain preserved even when both modalities are performed in the same session.
- supports: The Role of Intra-Session Exercise Sequence in the Interference Effect: A Systematic Revie… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2018) · cited 97x in the literature
"with no effect of exercise sequence for lower-body muscle hypertrophy (weighted mean difference, 1.15% change; 95% confidence interval -1.56, 3.87 change; p = 0.40)" (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Fun… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2022) · cited 136x in the literature
"The estimated standardised mean differences (SMD) based on the random-effects model were - 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.20 to 0.09; p = 0.446), - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.48 to - 0.08; p = 0.007), and - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.16 to 0.18; p = 0.919) for maximal strength, explosive strength, and muscle hypertrophy, respectively." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Higher levels of concurrent aerobic training may negatively affect muscle fiber hypertrophy specifically in type I muscle fibers.
"There was some evidence that perhaps even at somewhat higher levels, that maybe there was a negative effect on fiber type specific, particularly in the type I fibers." (said at 1:39:06)
Published meta-analytic evidence indicates that concurrent aerobic and resistance training can attenuate muscle fiber hypertrophy compared with resistance training alone, with the interference effect showing a stronger trend in type I muscle fibers than type II fibers (and reaching statistical significance under specific conditions such as running or higher-intensity endurance training).
- supports: The Effects of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Sys… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2022) · cited 59x in the literature
"The standardized mean differences were -0.34 (95% CI -0.72 to 0.04, p = 0.078) and -0.13 (95% CI -0.39 to 0.12, p = 0.315) for type I and type II fiber hypertrophy, respectively. A negative effect of concurrent training was observed for type I fibers when aerobic training was performed by running but not cycling (standardized mean difference -0.81, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.36)." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effects of Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Training Using Continuous or Intermittent P… (Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023) · cited 6x in the literature
"By contrast, RT induced greater type I and type II muscle fiber hypertrophy than CT when high-intensity interval training (HIIT) was incorporated alone (SMD > 0.33) or combined with continuous ET (SMD > 0.27), but not compared with CT incorporating only continuous ET (SMD < 0.16)." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Resistance training performed through a full range of motion provides flexibility benefits comparable to static stretching.
"With that said, resistance training itself is an active form of flexibility training, and there's been studies that show that compared to static stretching, you get similar benefits doing resistance training protocols, provided that you're training through a full range of motion." (said at 1:44:40)
Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses support the claim that resistance training, particularly when performed with external loads and through a full range of motion, induces improvements in joint range of motion and flexibility comparable to stretch training. A 2023 meta-analysis of 55 studies found that resistance training significantly improved range of motion (effect size = 0.73) with no statistically significant difference compared to stretch training (effect size = 0.08, p = 0.79). Similarly, a 2021 meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials found no significant difference between strength training and stretching protocols on range of motion outcomes.
Stretching the calf muscle for one hour a day using a stretching boot resulted in approximately 15% muscle growth in muscle thickness.
"showing that long-term if you stretch—now, this is a lot of stretching, but they did an hour a day using the stretching boot—um they got marked hypertrophy, like 15% growth in the calf muscles um and the muscle thickness." (said at 1:45:42)
A series of controlled trials investigating long-duration static stretching using a calf-stretching orthosis (device/boot) for 1 hour per day over 6 weeks demonstrated significant increases in gastrocnemius muscle thickness (hypertrophy) of up to 14–15%, comparable to conventional resistance training.
- supports: Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains. (Frontiers in physiology 2022) · cited 28x in the literature
"Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of 6 weeks of daily (1 h) unilateral static stretch training of the plantar flexors using a calf-muscle stretching device... Statistically significant increases in MSt of 6%-15% (p < .001-.049, d = 0.45-1.09), ROM of 6%-21% (p < .001-.037, d = 0.47-1.38) and MTh of 4%-14% (p < .001-.005, d = 0.46-0.72) from pre-to post-test were observed" (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Comparison of the effects of long-lasting static stretching and hypertrophy training on ma… (European journal of applied physiology 2023) · cited 33x in the literature
"IG1 stretched the plantar flexors continuously for one hour per day, IG2 performed hypertrophy training for the plantar flexors... The results of a series of two-way ANOVAs show significant interaction effects (p < 0.05) for maximal voluntary contraction (ƞ 2 = 0.143-0.32, p < 0.006), muscle thickness (ƞ 2 = 0.11-0.14, p < 0.021)... without significant differences (p = 0.37-0.99, d = 0.03-0.4) between both intervention groups." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi)
A 20-second loaded interset stretch between sets of calf raises promoted greater hypertrophy in the soleus muscle, with no substantial difference in the gastrocnemius.
"We recently published a study, and there were some papers before this also showing this, that what's called interset stretch, loaded stretch, um promoted somewhat greater gains. We used it in a calf exercise... And they did it for 20 seconds, and then they rested for the rest of the rest interval. And we found somewhat greater growth in the soleus muscle and really no difference, no substantial difference, in the gastrocnemius." (said at 1:46:47)
The speaker accurately describes the findings of their randomized within-subject study (PMID: 36048793). In 21 young healthy men performing calf raises twice per week over 8 weeks, adding a 20-second loaded inter-set stretch between sets led to a greater increase in soleus muscle thickness compared to traditional passive rest, whereas effects on the medial and lateral gastrocnemius were equivocal or ambiguous.
Blood flow restriction training using light loads (20% to 30% 1RM) produces muscle hypertrophy similar to traditional resistance training.
"Good evidence that it promotes similar muscle development to doing traditional resistance training regardless of the rep range." (said at 1:51:55)
Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrate that low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (typically performed at 20% to 30% of 1-repetition maximum) produces increases in muscle hypertrophy/mass comparable to traditional high-load resistance training. While traditional high-load training typically results in superior maximal strength adaptations, hypertrophic adaptations do not significantly differ between modalities.
- supports: Magnitude of Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load Resistance Training Ve… (Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2018) · cited 550x in the literature
"Regarding the hypertrophic response, results revealed similar effects between HL- and BFR-RT, regardless of the absolute occlusion pressure, cuff width, and occlusion pressure prescription. Based on the present data, maximum muscle strength may be optimized by specific training methods (i.e., HL-RT) while both HL- and BFR-RT seem equally effective in increasing muscle mass." (abstract, results and conclusions, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hype… (Journal of clinical medicine 2022) · cited 23x in the literature
"HL resistance training produces a small increase in muscle strength (eight studies; SMD, -0.23 [-0.41; -0.05]) but not in muscle hypertrophy (six studies; (SMD, 0.08 [-0.22; 0.38]) when compared with LL-BFR resistance training." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Untrained… (Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2024) · cited 9x in the literature
"No significant difference in muscle mass gains was observed between LL-BFR and HL-RT (SMD = 0.01, p = 0.94), and this conclusion remained consistent after controlling for modulating variables." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is hypothesized to increase the hypertrophic response to exercise.
"hypoxia-inducible factor is a substance that is thought to uh increase the hypertrophic response" (said at 1:53:26)
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) is recognized and hypothesized in exercise physiology as a key transcriptional mediator that facilitates skeletal muscle adaptation, myogenesis, and hypertrophy. In vitro and animal studies demonstrate that HIF-1α activation under hypoxic conditions triggers myogenic differentiation pathways (such as noncanonical Wnt/β-catenin and MyoD activation), leading to hypertrophic myotube formation. In human resistance training trials, HIF-1α expression increases alongside muscle fiber cross-sectional area and microvascular remodeling.
- supports: Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α promotes myogenesis through the noncanonical… (FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 2017) · cited 60x in the literature
"In particular, we found that the activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α under hypoxia, in murine skeletal myoblasts, leads to activation of MyoD through the noncanonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Moreover, chemical inhibition of HIF-1α activity significantly reduces differentiation, thus confirming its crucial role in the process. Furthermore, hypoxia-preconditioned myoblasts, once induced to differentiate under normoxic conditions, tend to form hypertrophic myotubes." (abstract, results, passage verified)
pubmedfull study (doi) - supports: Temporal Response of Angiogenesis and Hypertrophy to Resistance Training in Young Men. (Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2018) · cited 72x in the literature
"Resistance training effectively increased Type I (15% ± 4%; P < 0.01) and Type II fiber cross-sectional area (28% ± 5%; P < 0.0001)... while vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (P = 0.016), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (P = 0.016), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (P = 0.01) increased in both groups." (abstract, results)
pubmedfull study (doi)
Fact-checked episodes
Publications
- Dietary supplement use in longevity: evidence from 2,877 centenarians.GeroScience 2026 · CEBM Level 4
- Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries.GeroScience 2026 · CEBM Level 4
- Reference values for handgrip strength in Europe: analysis of individual participant data from 27 countries.GeroScience 2026 · CEBM Level 4
- Does longer-muscle length resistance training cause greater longitudinal growth in humans? A systematic review.Sports medicine and health science 2026 · CEBM Level 1
- Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-Based Approach: Are There Differences in Volume Load, Time Under Tension, and Metabolic Demands?Sports health 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- Accentuate the Negative? Effects of Eccentric Overload on Muscular Adaptations During Split Jerk Performance.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Resistance Training Prescription for Muscle Function, Hypertrophy, and Physical Performance in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Reviews.Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2026 · CEBM Level 1
- Comparison of two nutritional protocols in body re-composition of resistance-trained participants.European journal of applied physiology 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- Effects of Plant- vs Animal-Based Proteins on Muscle Protein Synthesis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2026 · CEBM Level 1
- Impact of Resistance Training on Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Cardiometabolic Health in Children and Adolescents With Overweight/Obesity: An Umbrella Review With Meta-Analyses.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 2026 · CEBM Level 1
- Research into resistance training response heterogeneity: a summary of the 2025 conference at the University of Jyväskylä.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Kinetic and Kinematic Changes Induced by Performance of Accentuated Eccentric Overload in Competitive Weightlifters: An Exploratory Study.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- Comparison of Repetition-Based Progressive-Overload Strategies in Resistance Training: Rest-Pause Versus Drop Sets.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- Response.Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2026 · CEBM Level 5
- Cool in theory, not in practice: Effects of interset palm cooling on resistance exercise performance and psychophysiology responses.Journal of sports sciences 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- Front-Loading Fatigue: Does the Pre-exhaustion Method influence Resistance Training-induced Muscular Adaptations?International journal of exercise science 2026 · CEBM Level 2
- Predictors of long-term resistance exercise adherence: evidence from a large cohort of mobile app users of various experience levels.Frontiers in sports and active living 2026 · CEBM Level 3
- Training volume increases or maintenance based on previous volume: the effects on muscular adaptations in trained males.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Cluster sets and traditional sets elicit similar muscular hypertrophy: a volume and effort-matched study in resistance-trained individuals.European journal of applied physiology 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Lengthened partial repetitions elicit similar muscular adaptations as full range of motion repetitions during resistance training in trained individuals.PeerJ 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Combining an Internal Attentional Focus With Mirror Motor Observation Enhances Mechanical Output During Isokinetic Leg-Extension Exercise.Journal of applied biomechanics 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- International consensus on the definition of functional training: Modified e-Delphi method.Journal of sports sciences 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Knee flexion range of motion does not influence muscle hypertrophy of the quadriceps femoris during leg press training in resistance-trained individuals.Journal of sports sciences 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Do Cheaters Prosper? Effect of Externally Supplied Momentum During Resistance Training on Measures of Upper Body Muscle Hypertrophy.International journal of exercise science 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Without Fail: Muscular Adaptations in Single-Set Resistance Training Performed to Failure or with Repetitions-in-Reserve.Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- From full to partials: Investigating the impact of range of motion training on maximum isometric action, and muscle hypertrophy in young women.Journal of sports sciences 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Implications and Applications of Stretch-Mediated Hypertrophy in Therapy, Rehabilitation and Athletic Training-An Outlook to Future Potential Applications.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2025 · CEBM Level 5
- Does Muscle Length Influence Regional Hypertrophy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of sports medicine 2025 · CEBM Level 1
- Dumbbell versus cable lateral raises for lateral deltoid hypertrophy: an experimental study.Frontiers in physiology 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Effects of Caffeine Supplementation on Neuromuscular Performance in Powerlifting Athletes: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Quadruple-Blinded, Cross-Over Study.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Resistance Training Beyond Momentary Failure: The Effects of Past-Failure Partials Versus Initial Partials on Calf Muscle Hypertrophy Among a Resistance-Trained Cohort.European journal of sport science 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- The effects of long muscle length isometric versus full range of motion isotonic training on regional quadriceps femoris hypertrophy in resistance-trained individuals.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme 2025 · CEBM Level 2
- Resistance training-induced appendicular lean tissue mass changes are largely unrelated to pre-training bone characteristics in a larger cohort of untrained adults.Frontiers in physiology 2025 · CEBM Level 3
- Prediction of One Repetition Maximum in Free-Weight Back Squat Using a Mixed Approach: The Combination of the Individual Load-Velocity Profile and Generalized Equations.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2024 · CEBM Level 4
- Gaining more from doing less? The effects of a one-week deload period during supervised resistance training on muscular adaptations.PeerJ 2024 · CEBM Level 2
- Determining Changes in Muscle Size and Architecture After Exercise Training: One Site Does Not Fit all.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Dose-Response Modelling of Resistance Exercise Across Outcome Domains in Strength and Conditioning: A Meta-analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2024 · CEBM Level 1
- Do Muscle Mass and Body Fat Differ Between Elite and Amateur Natural Physique Athletes on Competition Day? A Preliminary, Cross-Sectional, Anthropometric Study.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2024 · CEBM Level 4
- Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophy.Frontiers in sports and active living 2024 · CEBM Level 1
- Corrigendum to "Vinegar (acetic acid) intake on glucose metabolism: A narrative review" [Clin Nutr ESPEN 32 (2019) 1-7].Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2024 · CEBM Level 5
- Chronic Effects of Static Stretching Exercises on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine - open 2024 · CEBM Level 1
- Altitude differentially alters the force-velocity relationship after 3 weeks of power-oriented resistance training in elite judokas.European journal of sport science 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Age-related muscle anabolic resistance: inevitable or preventable?Nutrition reviews 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Resistance training volume does not influence lean mass preservation during energy restriction in trained males.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Maximizing Strength: The Stimuli and Mediators of Strength Gains and Their Application to Training and Rehabilitation.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Which ROMs Lead to Rome? A Systematic Review of the Effects of Range of Motion on Muscle Hypertrophy.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- Ergogenic Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate on Resistance Exercise: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Efficacy of progressive versus severe energy restriction on body composition and strength in concurrent trained women.European journal of applied physiology 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Training in the Initial Range of Motion Promotes Greater Muscle Adaptations Than at Final in the Arm Curl.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Efficacy of resistance training in hypoxia on muscle hypertrophy and strength development: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Scientific reports 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- The Effects of Carbohydrate Intake on Body Composition and Muscular Strength in Trained Men Undergoing a Progressive Resistance Training.International journal of exercise science 2023 · CEBM Level 3
- Physiological Responses and Adaptations to Lower Load Resistance Training: Implications for Health and Performance.Sports medicine - open 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Nutrition, Training, Supplementation, and Performance-Enhancing Drug Practices of Male and Female Physique Athletes Peaking for Competition.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023 · CEBM Level 4
- Myoelectric activity during electromagnetic resistance alone and in combination with variable resistance or eccentric overload.Scientific reports 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Fiber-Type-Specific Hypertrophy with the Use of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- Alterations in Measures of Body Composition, Neuromuscular Performance, Hormonal Levels, Physiological Adaptations, and Psychometric Outcomes during Preparation for Physique Competition: A Systematic Review of Case Studies.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology 2023 · CEBM Level 4
- Comparison of traditional vs. lighter load strength training on fat-free mass, strength, power and affective responses in middle and older-aged adults: A pilot randomized trial.Experimental gerontology 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Repetition Performance, Rating of Perceived Discomfort, and Blood Lactate Responses to Different Rest Interval Lengths in Single-Joint and Multijoint Lower-Body Exercise.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- The Effect of Feedback on Resistance Training Performance and Adaptations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- The Effects of Creatine Supplementation Combined with Resistance Training on Regional Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Nutrients 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- Low-Load x High-Load Resistance Exercise: Greater Cell Swelling After a Training Session.International journal of exercise science 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Author Correction: Efficacy of resistance training in hypoxia on muscle hypertrophy and strength development: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Scientific reports 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- Supervision during resistance training positively influences muscular adaptations in resistance-trained individuals.Journal of sports sciences 2023 · CEBM Level 2
- Meta-analysis of variation in sport and exercise science: Examples of application within resistance training research.Journal of sports sciences 2023 · CEBM Level 1
- Optimizing Resistance Training Technique to Maximize Muscle Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology 2023 · CEBM Level 5
- Training, Pharmacological Ergogenic Aids, Dehydration, and Nutrition Strategies during a Peak Week in Competitive Brazilian Bodybuilders: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study in a Non-World Anti-Doping Agency Competitive Environment.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2023 · CEBM Level 4
- Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of sport and health science 2022 · CEBM Level 1
- Partial range of motion training elicits favorable improvements in muscular adaptations when carried out at long muscle lengths.European journal of sport science 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Volume Reduction: Which Dose is Sufficient to Retain Resistance Training Adaptations in Older Women?International journal of sports medicine 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Does Varying Repetition Tempo in a Single-Joint Lower Body Exercise Augment Muscle Size and Strength in Resistance-Trained Men?Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Response to Comment on: "No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains after resistance training with different volume-matched loads: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme 2022 · CEBM Level 1
- Moderate and Higher Protein Intakes Promote Superior Body Recomposition in Older Women Performing Resistance Training.Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2022 · CEBM Level 3
- Improvement of Oxidative Stress in Older Women Is Dependent on Resistance Training Volume: Active Aging Longitudinal Study.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Partial range of motion and muscle hypertrophy: not all ROMs lead to Rome.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Changes in Intra-to-Extra-Cellular Water Ratio and Bioelectrical Parameters from Day-Before to Day-Of Competition in Bodybuilders: A Pilot Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2022 · CEBM Level 4
- Effect of different eccentric tempos on hypertrophy and strength of the lower limbs.Biology of sport 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Does Varying Resistance Exercises Promote Superior Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains? A Systematic Review.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022 · CEBM Level 1
- Comparison of Power Training vs Traditional Strength Training on Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open 2022 · CEBM Level 1
- A randomized trial on the efficacy of split-body versus full-body resistance training in non-resistance trained women.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Inter-set rest configuration effect on acute physiological and performance-related responses to a resistance training session in terrestrial vs simulated hypoxia.PeerJ 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Volume Load Rather Than Resting Interval Influences Muscle Hypertrophy During High-Intensity Resistance Training.Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- A Novel Plant-Based Protein Has Similar Effects Compared to Whey Protein on Body Composition, Strength, Power, and Aerobic Performance in Professional and Semi-Professional Futsal Players.Frontiers in nutrition 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Loaded inter-set stretch may selectively enhance muscular adaptations of the plantar flexors.PloS one 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Progressive overload without progressing load? The effects of load or repetition progression on muscular adaptations.PeerJ 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Effects of one long vs. two short resistance training sessions on training volume and affective responses in resistance-trained women.Frontiers in psychology 2022 · CEBM Level 2
- Beyond Mechanical Tension: A Review of Resistance Exercise-Induced Lactate Responses & Muscle Hypertrophy.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Effects of Capsaicin and Capsiate on Endurance Performance: A Meta-Analysis.Nutrients 2022 · CEBM Level 1
- Inter-set stretch: A potential time-efficient strategy for enhancing skeletal muscle adaptations.Frontiers in sports and active living 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Does Timing Matter? A Narrative Review of Intermittent Fasting Variants and Their Effects on Bodyweight and Body Composition.Nutrients 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and cost of alternative forms of creatine available for purchase on Amazon.com: are label claims supported by science?Heliyon 2022 · CEBM Level 5
- Biomechanical, Anthropometric and Psychological Determinants of Barbell Bench Press Strength.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2022 · CEBM Level 4
- Human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: a viable option for management of secondary hypogonadism and male infertility.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Loading Recommendations for Muscle Strength, Hypertrophy, and Local Endurance: A Re-Examination of the Repetition Continuum.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Effects of Power-Oriented Resistance Training During an Altitude Camp on Strength and Technical Performance of Elite Judokas.Frontiers in physiology 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Isolated Leucine and Branched-Chain Amino Acid Supplementation for Enhancing Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review.International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Impact of Low Hemoglobin on Body Composition, Strength, and Redox Status of Older Hemodialysis Patients Following Resistance Training.Frontiers in physiology 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Can conditions of skeletal muscle loss be improved by combining exercise with anabolic-androgenic steroids? A systematic review and meta-analysis of testosterone-based interventions.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders 2021 · CEBM Level 1
- The Impact of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Related Public-Health Measures on Training Behaviours of Individuals Previously Participating in Resistance Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2021 · CEBM Level 4
- Hormonal and Inflammatory Responses to Hypertrophy-Oriented Resistance Training at Acute Moderate Altitude.International journal of environmental research and public health 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Effects of a low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet on health parameters in resistance-trained women.European journal of applied physiology 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Carbohydrate refeed does not modify GVT-performance following energy restriction in bodybuilders.Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Personalized, Evidence-Informed Training Plans and Exercise Prescriptions for Performance, Fitness and Health.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Effects of a 12-Week Suspension versus Traditional Resistance Training Program on Body Composition, Bioimpedance Vector Patterns, and Handgrip Strength in Older Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Rest-pause and drop-set training elicit similar strength and hypertrophy adaptations compared with traditional sets in resistance-trained males.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Effects of Two vs. Four Weekly Campus Board Training Sessions on Bouldering Performance and Climbing-Specific Tests in Advanced and Elite Climbers.Journal of sports science & medicine 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Effects of Time-Restricted Feeding on Supramaximal Exercise Performance and Body Composition: A Randomized and Counterbalanced Crossover Study in Healthy Men.International journal of environmental research and public health 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Split or full-body workout routine: which is best to increase muscle strength and hypertrophy?Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: sodium bicarbonate and exercise performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- The Effect of Whole Egg Intake on Muscle Mass: Are the Yolk and Its Nutrients Important?International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Drop-Set Training Elicits Differential Increases in Non-Uniform Hypertrophy of the Quadriceps in Leg Extension Exercise.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2021 · CEBM Level 2
- Muscle Fiber Type Transitions with Exercise Training: Shifting Perspectives.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2021 · CEBM Level 5
- Effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on exercise performance: an umbrella review.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2021 · CEBM Level 1
- Slow and Steady, or Hard and Fast? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Body Composition Changes between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 2021 · CEBM Level 1
- Caffeine Ingestion Enhances Repetition Velocity in Resistance Exercise: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind Study Involving Control and Placebo Conditions.Journal of human kinetics 2020 · CEBM Level 2
- Resistance Exercise Intensity Does Not Influence Neurotrophic Factors Response in Equated Volume Schemes.Journal of human kinetics 2020 · CEBM Level 2